Churning Signals in an Advisory Account
A registered representative manages $1.2 million for a 74-year-old retired teacher with a conservative profile and a fixed income need of $4,000 per month. Over the past 11 months, the account has generated $38,000 in commissions and 62 trades, including repeated purchases and sales of the same three mutual funds within weeks. The account's value is down 9% while a comparable conservative benchmark is up 2%. The client's daughter calls to say her mother does not understand the statements and has started asking why her monthly checks are smaller. The representative says the trading reflects "tactical adjustments" and that the client "has always been fine with it." The client's signed profile still shows conservative risk tolerance and income as the primary objective.
1. Evaluate whether this activity raises suitability or excessive-trading concerns, and identify the specific evidence you would weigh.
Read the worked answer
The pattern raises serious concerns. The evidence includes trade frequency, cost-to-assets, and consistency with objectives. Sixty-two trades in 11 months on a $1.2 million account is high, and $38,000 in commissions is roughly 3.2% of assets in under a year. Repeated round trips in the same funds within weeks are hard to justify as tactical adjustments in a conservative income account, where the benchmark gained 2% while the account lost 9%.
The suitability concern is separate from the excessive-trading concern. Even if each trade were suitable in isolation, the aggregate turnover and cost may be inconsistent with a conservative, income-focused objective. You should compare the cost and turnover to the firm's thresholds, review whether the client understood and authorized each trade, and check whether the income need was being met. The daughter's report that the client does not understand the statements is a red flag for authorization and for potential diminished capacity. The representative's claim that the client "has always been fine with it" is not documentation.
2. What immediate steps should the firm take, and what should happen to the representative while the review is pending?
Read the worked answer
The firm should preserve records, including trade blotters, statements, correspondence, and notes, and open a supervisory review. A principal should interview the client privately, with her consent, to confirm her objectives, her understanding of the trading, and whether she authorized it. Given the daughter's report, the firm should consider whether a trusted contact or additional safeguards are appropriate under its senior-investor procedures.
The representative should be placed under heightened supervision, with pre-approval of new trades, and consideration of a temporary restriction on the account pending the review. If the review confirms excessive trading, the firm should remediate the client, which may include reimbursing excess costs, and report the matter through its supervisory and, if required, regulatory channels. The representative's conduct should be evaluated against firm policy and applicable rules on suitability and excessive trading.