I85PREP
⌘ K
CIRO Supervisor study materials
CIRO Supervisor study resources

The Client Who Wants to Move Money for a 'Business Deal'

CIRO Supervisor · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Client Who Wants to Move Money for a 'Business Deal'

A relationship manager at a wealth firm receives a request from a long-standing client, a 63-year-old retired teacher with a moderate-risk portfolio, to liquidate CAD 180,000 (about 40% of the account) and wire it to a newly opened corporate account at another institution. The stated purpose is an investment in a 'private real estate venture' run by a person the client met online four months ago. The corporate account was opened 11 days ago. The client is unusually evasive about the venture's documentation, declines to provide a prospectus, and becomes irritated when asked. The client's prior activity is unremarkable: regular contributions, two withdrawals in five years, no wires to third parties. The relationship manager notes the client mentioned 'guaranteed 18% returns' and that a 'compliance officer' from the venture had called to 'confirm the transfer is legitimate.'

1. What red flags are present, and what should the relationship manager do before processing the request?

Read the worked answer

This presents a cluster of fraud and financial-crime indicators, not a routine withdrawal.

Red flags:

  1. New payee, new corporate account (11 days old) - a classic mule or fraud-collection account pattern.
  2. Large proportion of the account (40%) relative to the client's profile and risk tolerance.
  3. Unusual behavior - evasiveness, irritation, refusal to provide documentation, departure from a stable five-year pattern.
  4. Implausible return claim - 'guaranteed 18%' on a private real estate venture is a hallmark of investment fraud.
  5. Third-party 'compliance officer' calling the client to 'confirm legitimacy' - no legitimate compliance officer cold-calls a client to vouch for a transfer. This is likely the fraudster creating false reassurance and possibly probing the firm's controls.
  6. Online-only relationship of four months - romance/investment fraud pattern.

Before processing:

  • Do not simply execute. Apply the firm's escalation procedure for suspected elder financial exploitation and suspected fraud.
  • Ask open, non-accusatory questions and document: who introduced the venture, what documents exist, who the counterparties are, whether the client has met anyone in person.
  • Attempt to contact a trusted contact person if the firm has one on file and policy permits.
  • Consider a temporary hold consistent with firm policy and applicable rules, and document the basis.
  • Escalate to compliance/AML and, where required, consider a suspicious transaction report.
  • Do not tip off the client that a report may be filed.
  • Record the third-party call: who called, from what number, what was said.

2. The client insists and says it is his money. How should the firm balance client autonomy against its obligations?

Read the worked answer

Client autonomy is real but not absolute; the firm's obligations run alongside it.

Framing:

  • The client has the right to direct his own affairs, and the firm should not paternalistically block a lawful transaction merely because it seems unwise.
  • But the firm has obligations: to act on reasonable grounds when it suspects fraud or exploitation, to make a suitability assessment where the transaction is an account recommendation, and to file suspicious transaction reports where the threshold is met.
  • The tension is resolved by process, not by picking a side.

Practical approach:

  1. Separate the two issues. (a) Is this a suspicious transaction? (b) Is the liquidation suitable for this client? They have different tests.
  2. Suspicious transaction: if the red flags stand after inquiry, the firm's AML obligations apply regardless of client insistence. A SAR/STR may be required; the client is not told.
  3. Suitability: if the firm recommends the liquidation or the venture, suitability applies. If the client directs it unsolicited, document that it is unsolicited and that the client was warned.
  4. Escalation and delay: many firms permit a short hold to investigate. Use it, document it, and keep the client informed of the process without disclosing any report.
  5. Trusted contact / elder protection: where the client may be a victim of exploitation, contacting a trusted contact or adult protective services may be appropriate under firm policy and local law.
  6. If the firm proceeds, do so with a documented warning, a record of the client's insistence, and a note that the firm advised caution.

What the firm must not do is process the wire silently because the client was insistent, or refuse indefinitely without a documented basis.