Termination Without Good Cause: The 30-Day Notice and the Cure Period
A franchisor in California terminates a franchisee's agreement effective immediately on June 1, 2025, citing the franchisee's failure to meet a monthly sales quota for three consecutive months. The franchise agreement states that failure to meet the quota is a material breach and allows termination without notice. The franchisee has been operating for 5 years and has never been late on royalties. The franchisee claims that the quota is unreasonable and that the franchisor did not provide any notice or opportunity to cure. The franchisor argues that the quota is a reasonable standard and that the agreement expressly permits immediate termination. The franchisee also alleges that the franchisor terminated in retaliation for the franchisee's complaints about advertising fees. The California Franchise Relations Act (CFRA) applies.
1. Did the franchisor violate the CFRA by terminating without notice? Analyze the good cause requirement and the notice/cure provisions.
Read the worked answer
Under the California Franchise Relations Act, Corporations Code section 20020, a franchisor may not terminate a franchise before the expiration of its term except for good cause. Good cause includes a material breach of the franchise agreement, but the franchisor must provide the franchisee with 30 days' written notice of the termination and an opportunity to cure the breach. The notice must state the reasons for termination and the actions required to cure. Here, the franchisor terminated immediately without notice. The failure to meet a sales quota could be a material breach, but the franchisor must still give notice and 30 days to cure, unless the breach is one that cannot be cured. A sales quota breach is generally curable by improving sales. The franchisor's reliance on the contract's immediate termination clause is not sufficient because the CFRA overrides contrary contract terms. Therefore, the termination violated section 20020. The franchisor should have provided written notice and 30 days to cure before terminating.
2. What are the franchisee's remedies if the termination was retaliatory or without good cause?
Read the worked answer
If the termination was without good cause or retaliatory, the franchisee may seek damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees under Corporations Code section 20035. The franchisee can argue that the termination was in retaliation for complaining about advertising fees, which could violate the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and the CFRA's prohibition on retaliation. The franchisee may also seek rescission of the termination and reinstatement. The franchisor may be liable for actual damages, including lost profits, and possibly punitive damages if the conduct was willful. The franchisee should file a complaint with the DFPI and may pursue civil action. The franchisor's failure to follow the notice and cure procedures strengthens the franchisee's case.