The Reluctant Volunteer
A 34-year-old man is referred by his employer's occupational health unit after a workplace injury left him with chronic low back pain rated 7/10 despite physical therapy. At the first session he states he is only attending because his manager insisted and that he "doesn't believe in this stuff." He is polite but guarded, arms crossed, and asks how many sessions before he can stop. He has no psychiatric history, takes no sedatives, and has a clear medical workup. You have 30 minutes for this intake and the clinic books follow-ups in 50-minute blocks. He mentions he was once pressured into a therapy he disliked and quit after two sessions.
1. What is the most defensible next step regarding informed consent and proceeding to hypnosis in this first session?
Read the worked answer
The core judgement is that consent must be voluntary and informed, and pressure from a third party (the employer) does not substitute for the patient's own agreement. Because he has explicitly framed attendance as coerced, proceeding straight to an induction risks both an ethical breach and a poor outcome, since negative expectancy and resistance reduce responsiveness.
The defensible step is to reframe the first session as an information-gathering and consent conversation rather than a treatment session. Explain what clinical hypnosis is and is not, its evidence base for chronic pain, the right to decline or stop at any point, and the limits of confidentiality. Explicitly separate your role from the employer's: clarify what, if anything, will be communicated back and obtain written authorization for any disclosure. Explore the prior pressured therapy, since it is likely driving his guardedness.
Do not force an induction to "show him it works." Offer hypnosis as an option he can accept or defer, and document his decision either way. If he declines, a non-hypnotic pain-management conversation is still legitimate and keeps the door open.
2. He agrees to "try one session" but says he will stop if he feels controlled. How should you structure the induction and the language you use?
Read the worked answer
Honor the stated boundary by making control explicit throughout. Use permissive rather than authoritative phrasing: "you may find it comfortable to let your eyes close when you are ready" rather than commands. Build in a continuous consent frame by telling him he can open his eyes, speak, or stop at any time and that this will be respected without comment.
Choose a low-demand induction such as a guided breathing or eye-fixation method with frequent check-ins, and avoid techniques that emphasize surrender or loss of control. Offer choices at each step (eyes open or closed, imagery or simple physical relaxation) because perceived choice increases engagement and reduces reactance.
Keep the first session short and success-oriented: aim for a light trance and one small, concrete gain (for example, noticing that the pain can shift or that he can relax a specific area) rather than a deep analgesic suggestion. Debrief afterward, ask what felt acceptable and what did not, and let him decide about a second session. Document the consent dialogue and his stated conditions.