The Favour for a Friend
You supervise a small security team at a retail site. Your cousin applies for a vacant guard position. He meets the basic requirements but is less experienced than another applicant, a former military police officer with strong references. Your site manager trusts your judgement and has said 'you decide, just let me know'. Separately, a friend who owns a shop in the centre asks you to 'keep an extra eye' on his unit and to let him know if you see certain people hanging around, which would mean sharing CCTV observations about individuals.
1. How do you handle the recruitment decision and the request from your friend?
Read the worked answer
Recruitment: you must not decide alone. Even with your site manager's delegation, appointing a relative creates a conflict of interest and the appearance of favouritism, which damages team trust and could breach your employer's policy. Declare the relationship to your manager in writing, step out of the assessment and interview, and ask that someone independent makes or co-signs the decision. Provide your cousin the same information as other applicants about the process. If he is unsuccessful, he is entitled to feedback like anyone else, but you should not be the person giving it.
The friend's request: sharing CCTV observations about named or identifiable individuals is a data-protection and ethics issue. You can agree to normal site security coverage, which already applies to all units, but you should not single out individuals for personal reports to a friend. Explain that you can only share information through proper channels, such as a documented incident report to the site manager or, where appropriate, the police. If there is a genuine security concern, it should be reported through the site's process, not informally to a tenant.
Reasoning: both situations test whether you separate personal relationships from professional decisions. The safe path is transparency, declaration, and using the proper channel, even when it feels awkward.
2. Your cousin is not appointed and complains that you 'didn't even try'. How do you respond, and what do you do about the team's reaction?
Read the worked answer
Respond to your cousin honestly and briefly: the decision was made independently because of your relationship, you did not take part, and the successful candidate had stronger relevant experience. Do not disclose details of the other applicant beyond what is fair, and do not criticise the process. Acknowledge his disappointment without apologising for following the policy.
With the team: be proactive. Brief them that you declared the conflict and that the selection was made independently. If you say nothing, rumour will fill the gap and some staff may assume nepotism was avoided only by luck, or that it was attempted. A short, factual statement protects trust.
Also review the process: was the vacancy advertised internally, were criteria set before applications, and were notes kept? If not, tighten these for next time so future decisions are defensible.
Reasoning: the supervisor's credibility rests on being seen to apply the same rules to everyone. Handling the fallout openly and without defensiveness turns a difficult personal situation into evidence of integrity.