The Unlicensed Arrangement Fee
Rosa manages a licensed funeral establishment in a mid-size California city. A local hospital discharge planner, Dana, has referred 14 families to Rosa over the past eight months. Dana is not employed by the funeral home and holds no funeral license. In June, Rosa's owner began paying Dana $150 per family that signed a contract, recorded as 'community outreach consulting.' Dana also receives $75 from a separate crematory for each family she steers there, and Rosa knows some of those families also signed with Rosa. In September a family complained that Dana pressured them at the hospital bedside and quoted a price Rosa's firm never authorized. Rosa's owner insists the payments are legal because Dana is an independent contractor, not an employee. Rosa must decide whether to keep the arrangement and how to unwind it. She also wonders whether the crematory's parallel payments change her exposure.
1. Evaluate the legality of the per-family payments to Dana under California funeral law. What should Rosa advise the owner, and what immediate steps should she take?
Read the worked answer
Per-family payments to an unlicensed person for steering families into a funeral contract are the core of unlawful mortuary solicitation and unearned rebating. California law prohibits paying or receiving compensation for bringing funeral business to a licensee, and it prohibits unlicensed persons from soliciting funeral arrangements. The label 'consulting' does not cure this: the payment is calculated per signed contract, which is the hallmark of a referral fee rather than genuine outreach work.
Rosa should advise the owner to stop the payments immediately, terminate the arrangement, document the 14 prior referrals, and refund or credit affected families where feasible. She should also review whether Dana's bedside conduct crossed into unauthorized solicitation and whether the quoted price created a false-advertising exposure. Because Dana also took money from the crematory, the arrangement looks like a coordinated steering scheme, which increases regulatory risk. Rosa should consult counsel and consider self-reporting to the licensing authority before a complaint forces the issue.
2. Dana's conduct at the hospital bedside produced a family complaint about an unauthorized quoted price. How should Rosa handle the complaint and what records must she preserve?
Read the worked answer
Rosa should treat the complaint as both a consumer-protection matter and a licensing risk. She should contact the family promptly, obtain a written statement, compare the quoted price against her firm's filed price list, and determine whether Dana had authority to quote anything. If the quote was unauthorized, Rosa should send a written correction and honor the lower of the quoted price or her filed price to avoid a false-advertising claim.
She must preserve the original complaint, the family's contract and itemized statement, all price lists in effect during the relevant period, and Dana's payment records. California requires licensees to maintain business records and make them available to the licensing authority on request; destroying or 'cleaning up' the referral ledger would be a separate violation. Rosa should also document her corrective action and any refund, and retain the file for the applicable retention period. Finally, she should review intake procedures so no unlicensed person quotes prices or pressures families.