The Couple, the Secret, and the Subpoena
You are an LMFT in private practice in Sacramento. For eight months you have been seeing Priya and Daniel for couples therapy, with both adults signing a written agreement that you treat the relationship as the client. In session 19, Priya discloses-outside Daniel's presence, in an individual check-in that your informed consent permits-that she has been meeting a former partner. She asks you to keep it secret and to help her decide whether to tell Daniel. Two weeks later, Daniel files for divorce and his attorney serves you with a subpoena duces tecum seeking your complete file, including any individual disclosures. Priya's attorney sends a letter demanding you assert privilege and produce nothing. Daniel's attorney argues that because both spouses signed the consent, neither can claim privilege against the other.
1. Identify the competing legal and ethical obligations you face regarding the subpoena and Priya's individual disclosure, and explain how you should proceed before producing any records.
Read the worked answer
Two duties collide. First, confidentiality and the psychotherapist-patient privilege under Evidence Code sections 1010-1014 belong to the holder-here, the joint holders of the couple's therapy. Second, a subpoena is not a court order; it does not by itself authorize release, and you must not produce records merely because it was served.
Your steps: (1) Do not release anything yet. (2) Notify both clients in writing that you received the subpoena so each can assert privilege or object. (3) Consult your own attorney; if the parties' positions conflict, you may need independent counsel or to seek a protective order. (4) If Priya's individual disclosure was made under a confidentiality agreement you documented, that material may be separately protected, but you cannot unilaterally decide-assert the privilege and let a court rule. (5) Consider whether the couple's agreement should have anticipated this; going forward, written policies should address individual disclosures and subpoenas.
Key judgment: you are not the privilege holder and cannot waive it, but you also cannot ignore a subpoena. The safe path is notice, assertion of privilege, and judicial resolution-not production.
2. Priya asks you to keep the affair secret and to help her decide whether to disclose to Daniel. How should you respond, given your treatment agreement and the risk of harm to the relationship?
Read the worked answer
You should acknowledge Priya's request and clarify the limits of confidentiality you disclosed at intake. If your informed consent states that individual check-ins are confidential unless there is a risk of harm or a legal obligation, you honor the secret but explain that you cannot conceal it from Daniel if he directly asks whether you hold information, and you cannot lie on his behalf.
You should not agree to keep a secret that makes you a party to deception within the therapy you are conducting. A defensible approach: tell Priya you will not volunteer the disclosure, but you will not collude in a lie; encourage her to disclose with your support; explore the function of the secrecy and the risk to treatment. If she refuses, you may need to revisit the treatment frame-some therapists conclude they cannot continue couples work under a material secret and offer referrals or a renegotiated contract.
Document your reasoning, what you told each partner, and any agreement. The judgment the exam tests is balancing the individual's confidentiality against your duty of honesty to the other client and the integrity of the couple's treatment.
3. If you are later ordered by the court to testify, what should you do about Priya's individual disclosure and about your own clinical opinions?
Read the worked answer
An order from the court supersedes the subpoena and generally requires compliance, but you should still assert privilege until the judge rules and seek clarification of scope. You should testify only to what is ordered-not volunteer the individual disclosure if the court has not compelled it, and not offer opinions beyond your role.
On clinical opinions: you may be asked for opinions about the couple's dynamics or parenting. You should distinguish facts you observed from opinions, avoid opinions about custody or the other party's fitness unless qualified and ordered, and avoid becoming an advocate for either spouse. If asked to opine on matters outside your role, you may state the limits of your evaluation.
Document the order, what you disclosed, and your rationale. The tested judgment is that you comply with lawful orders while minimizing disclosure, asserting privilege where it has not been overruled, and staying within your role.