The Telehealth Client in Another State
You are an LMFT licensed in California, practicing from your home in Oakland. A prospective client, Ms. Okafor, contacts you after finding your directory listing. She is a graduate student at a California university but is living in Seattle, Washington, for a 10-month internship. She wants weekly video sessions for anxiety and says her student insurance will reimburse. She has never been a California resident. You hold no Washington license. Your malpractice policy covers California practice. Your informed consent mentions telehealth generally but not interstate practice.
1. Can you accept Ms. Okafor as a client? Analyze the jurisdictional and licensure issues.
Read the worked answer
Licensure generally follows the location of the client at the time of service. If Ms. Okafor is physically in Washington during sessions, Washington law likely governs whether you may practice there, and California licensure alone does not authorize practice in another state. Accepting her without a Washington license or an applicable authorization risks unlicensed practice and may void insurance and malpractice coverage.
Exceptions to check: some states allow limited telehealth by out-of-state licensees, and interstate compacts or temporary practice provisions may apply. You should verify Washington's requirements directly with its licensing board, not rely on assumptions or on the client's student status. Her California university affiliation does not make her a California client; her physical location during sessions controls.
Options: decline and refer to a Washington-licensed clinician; obtain appropriate authorization if available; or, if she returns to California, resume then. The tested judgment is that you must verify the law of the client's location before accepting the case.
2. If you decline, how do you handle the referral, the informed consent gap, and the insurance question ethically?
Read the worked answer
Decline clearly and promptly, explain the licensure reason in plain language, and provide several Washington-licensed referrals or a directory resource. Do not abandon her: offer a brief bridge only if lawful and clinically appropriate, and confirm she has another provider. Do not bill her insurance for services you cannot lawfully provide.
On informed consent: your form should have addressed interstate telehealth, the location requirement, emergency protocols for the client's physical location, and the limits of your license. Its absence is a gap to fix now-add a telehealth addendum covering client location verification at each session, emergency contacts and local resources, technology and privacy, and coverage limits.
Document the inquiry, your verification steps, the referral, and the consent revision. The tested judgment is that declining is the ethical act, and that you must close the loop with referrals and fix the systemic consent gap.
3. Suppose Ms. Okafor says she will "just say she's in California" during sessions. How should you respond?
Read the worked answer
You should refuse. Misrepresenting the client's location to obtain services is a misrepresentation that could constitute fraud, expose you to unlicensed-practice allegations, and jeopardize your license and malpractice coverage. It also undermines the trust and honesty the therapeutic relationship requires.
Respond directly: explain that you verify location at each session, that you cannot participate in misrepresentation, and that you will not continue if she is in Washington. Offer lawful alternatives-Washington-licensed referrals, or resuming when she returns to California. Document the conversation.
If she persists or becomes deceptive, terminate appropriately with referrals and a written summary, following your termination policy. The tested judgment is that client pressure does not convert an unlawful arrangement into a lawful one, and that you document and refer rather than accommodate.