Two Reports of the Same Science Fair
Two pupils write about the same school science fair. Ana writes: "Our volcano model erupted beautifully. We used baking soda and vinegar, and the foam rose about 20 cm. Everyone clapped. It was the best project in the hall." Ben writes: "The volcano project used baking soda and vinegar. The foam reached roughly 20 cm, according to the team. The judges awarded first place to a solar-oven project, not the volcano. Several visitors said the volcano was the most entertaining display." A teacher asks the class which report is more useful for someone who wants to know what happened at the fair, and why the two accounts differ.
1. Compare what each report tells a reader about (a) the height of the foam and (b) which project won. Which report gives more reliable information, and why?
Read the worked answer
On the foam height, both reports say about 20 cm, so they agree on the fact. The difference is how it is presented: Ana states it as her own observation, while Ben attributes it to the team ("according to the team"), showing where the information came from. On the winner, the reports differ sharply. Ana says the volcano was "the best project in the hall," which is her opinion, not a result. Ben states that the judges gave first place to a solar-oven project and separately notes that visitors found the volcano most entertaining. Ben's report is more reliable for factual questions because it separates the official result from people's opinions and names the source of the measurement. Ana's report mixes fact with personal judgement.
2. A reader says, "Ana's report is wrong because it says the volcano was best." Do you agree that this makes her report wrong? Explain using the difference between fact and opinion.
Read the worked answer
Not exactly. "Best project" is an opinion, so it cannot be simply "wrong" in the way a factual error can; it reflects Ana's view. However, if a reader takes it as a statement of the official result, it becomes misleading, because Ben reports that the judges chose the solar oven. The accurate criticism is that Ana presents an opinion in a way that could be mistaken for a fact, and she leaves out the judges' decision. Her factual details (baking soda, vinegar, about 20 cm) are not contradicted. So the report is not false in its facts, but it is incomplete and blurs opinion with outcome, which makes it less dependable for someone asking what actually happened.