The Partnership That Never Filed
Owen and Rachel have run a landscaping business together for five years. They never formed an entity, never signed a partnership agreement, and never filed anything with the state. They share profits 60/40 (Owen takes 60), maintain a joint checking account labeled with the business name, and both appear on the business license. Owen handles crews and equipment; Rachel handles clients and books. Last spring Rachel signed a $70,000 contract to buy a commercial mower from a dealer, signing as "R. Alvarez, partner." Owen had told her in a text that the purchase was too expensive and he opposed it. The mower was delivered and used for four months before the business slowed. The dealer now demands payment; Owen says the debt is Rachel's alone. Separately, Rachel discovered Owen took $18,000 from the account to buy a boat, claiming it as his share of profits.
1. What business form exists here, and does the dealer have a claim against Owen personally?
Read the worked answer
The business is a general partnership. No filing or written agreement is required; sharing profits and losses and carrying on a business as co-owners creates one by operation of law, and the business license and joint account reinforce it. Both are general partners, jointly and severally liable for partnership obligations.
On the mower contract, the question is authority. A partner is an agent of the partnership for acts apparently carrying on the business in the ordinary course, and the partnership is bound unless the partner lacked authority and the third party knew it. Buying a commercial mower is squarely within a landscaping business. Owen's private text to Rachel does not bind the dealer, who had no notice. Rachel signed as a partner, the mower was delivered to and used by the business, and the dealer reasonably relied.
The result: the partnership is liable, and because partners are jointly and severally liable, the dealer may pursue Owen personally. Owen's remedy is contribution from Rachel or a partnership accounting, not a defense against the dealer. Owen could escape only by proving the dealer had actual knowledge of his restriction, which he cannot.
2. How should the $18,000 withdrawal be characterized, and what are Rachel's options?
Read the worked answer
Absent an agreement, a partner may not withdraw capital or take partnership property for personal use outside the agreed distribution mechanism. Owen's 60 percent share of profits is not a license to take cash unilaterally; distributions must be made according to the partnership agreement or, failing that, by majority of the partners. A secret $18,000 withdrawal to buy a boat is a breach of the duty of loyalty and an improper diversion of partnership funds.
Rachel's options, in escalating order. First, demand an accounting of the partnership's finances, which she has a right to as a partner. Second, demand repayment or an offset against Owen's future distributions, documented in writing. Third, if Owen refuses, sue for breach of fiduciary duty and an accounting. Fourth, consider dissolution and winding up, which any partner may demand at will in a partnership with no fixed term.
Rachel should also note the tax issue: Owen's withdrawal may be a distribution reducing his basis or a disguised payment, with different consequences. She should reconstruct the books before confronting him.
3. Rachel wants to restructure to limit personal liability. Compare the realistic options and identify the transition issues.
Read the worked answer
Three candidates. A limited liability company is usually best: flexible management, pass-through taxation by default, and member liability limited to investment. A corporation offers limited liability but imposes formalities and possible double taxation unless an S election is made. A limited partnership requires at least one general partner who remains personally liable, so it only helps if Owen and Rachel become limited partners and an entity serves as general partner, which adds complexity.
Transition issues matter more than the choice. Forming an LLC does not extinguish debts incurred by the partnership; the existing $70,000 mower obligation and any other liabilities remain the partners' responsibility unless the creditor agrees to a novation. The new entity should be capitalized by contributions of partnership assets, with a written assignment and a clear record of what transferred. The dealer and other creditors should be notified and asked to consent to the assumption.
Rachel should also insist on a written operating agreement covering capital accounts, distribution ratios, voting, deadlock, buy-sell terms, and a clause requiring dual signatures on withdrawals above a threshold. The $18,000 incident is the reason. Both should confirm the tax treatment of the conversion with an accountant.