The Contract Signed Under Pressure
Lena and Marcus married in 2018. Two weeks before the wedding, Marcus presented Lena with a 20-page prenuptial agreement. It provided that on separation Marcus would keep the house he owned before the marriage and Lena would receive nothing from it, and that neither would claim spousal support. Lena had no independent legal advice; Marcus's lawyer drafted the document and told Lena to sign. Lena, then 26 and pregnant, signed. They separated in 2024 after six years of marriage. Lena, now earning $38,000, seeks support and a share of the increase in the house's value. Marcus relies on the agreement. The jurisdiction permits prenuptial agreements but allows a court to set them aside for unconscionability, lack of disclosure, or absence of independent advice.
1. Is the prenuptial agreement likely to be enforced?
Read the worked answer
Enforcement is doubtful in these facts. Family-law agreements are enforceable only if each party understood the nature and consequences of the contract and voluntarily entered it. Lena had no independent legal advice, was presented with a complex 20-page document two weeks before the wedding, and was pregnant and financially dependent. The timing and pressure support a finding of inadequate voluntariness. The absence of disclosure of Marcus's finances is a further problem. The support waiver is especially vulnerable because it may leave Lena dependent on the state. A court would likely set aside or decline to enforce the agreement, at least as to support and the house's increase, while possibly preserving provisions that are fair and were understood.
2. If the agreement is set aside, how would the house and support be addressed?
Read the worked answer
The house was Marcus's pre-marital asset, so its original value is likely excluded, but the increase in value during the six-year marriage may be shareable, depending on how the jurisdiction treats appreciation and contributions. Lena's contributions as a spouse and parent, and any renovations or payments she made, would be relevant. For support, the court would apply the statutory factors: length of marriage, roles during marriage, Lena's earning capacity, the standard of living, and any disadvantage from the marriage. A six-year marriage with a young child may support time-limited or needs-based support, not necessarily indefinite support. The court would also consider child support separately. Setting aside the agreement restores the ordinary statutory analysis rather than guaranteeing Lena a particular result.
3. What should Lena argue, and what should Marcus argue, about the agreement's procedural fairness?
Read the worked answer
Lena should emphasize the lack of independent advice, the last-minute timing, her pregnancy and dependence, the absence of financial disclosure, and the one-sided result. She should also argue that the support waiver is unconscionable because it would leave her without a remedy. Marcus would argue that Lena was an adult who signed voluntarily, that she had time to seek advice, and that the agreement was a condition of the marriage. He might point to any oral explanation he gave her. The court will weigh the procedural defects against the substance: a contract that is both procedurally flawed and substantively unfair is the strongest case for setting aside. Marcus's best path is to show Lena understood the terms and had a genuine opportunity to obtain advice.