CONO Clinical Sciences study materials
CONO Clinical Sciences study resources

Antibiotic Choice for a Diabetic with a Foot Ulcer and Penicillin Allergy

CONO Clinical Sciences · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Antibiotic Choice for a Diabetic with a Foot Ulcer and Penicillin Allergy

A 57-year-old man with type 2 diabetes (A1c 9.8%) presents with a 3 cm by 2 cm plantar ulcer of the right great toe present for three weeks. The wound has a shallow depth, no exposed bone, and a rim of erythema extending 1.5 cm beyond the wound edge. He is afebrile, HR 88, BP 138/82, and reports no chills. He has a documented anaphylactic reaction to penicillin as a child (hives and throat tightness). He takes metformin 1000 mg twice daily and lisinopril. He has no recent antibiotic exposure. The clinic has no access to wound culture results for 48 hours, and the patient asks whether he can just use leftover cephalexin from a prior prescription.

1. Is this a superficial or complicated infection, and what empiric antibiotic strategy is appropriate given the allergy?

Read the worked answer

This appears to be a mild, superficial diabetic foot infection: erythema limited to about 1.5 cm, no deep involvement, no exposed bone, no systemic signs, and no abscess. Mild infections are usually managed with oral therapy directed at gram-positive cocci, typically 1-2 weeks, alongside offloading and wound care. The critical issue is the reported anaphylaxis to penicillin. A childhood reaction of hives plus throat tightness is a severe immediate-type reaction, so cephalosporins with shared side chains carry small but real cross-reactivity risk, and the leftover cephalexin should not be used without allergy clarification. Reasonable options include a non-beta-lactam such as clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (if local resistance patterns permit), or doxycycline, chosen with local susceptibility data. Because he is afebrile and the infection is mild, oral therapy is appropriate; IV therapy is not indicated. Document the allergy description precisely (reaction type, timing, treatment) rather than relying on the label 'penicillin allergy,' and refer for allergy evaluation after the acute episode.

2. What non-antibiotic management and follow-up plan should accompany the prescription?

Read the worked answer

Antibiotics alone will fail without pressure offloading. Prescribe a total contact cast or removable offloading boot, keep weight off the great toe, and arrange daily dressing changes with a moist wound environment. Assess vascular status (pedal pulses, ABI if available) and neurologic status; document monofilament testing. Address glycemic control, since an A1c of 9.8% impairs healing, and coordinate with his primary care team about intensifying therapy. Schedule a wound recheck in 3-5 days to confirm the erythema is receding; if it is spreading, deepening, or he develops systemic signs, escalate to imaging for osteomyelitis and consider IV therapy. Give return precautions: fever, red streaking, increased pain, dark tissue, or foul odor. Confirm he can see his feet and has help with dressing changes. Review lisinopril and metformin for any acute illness precautions. Document that he was counseled not to use leftover antibiotics.

3. How should the clinician handle the patient's request to use leftover cephalexin?

Read the worked answer

Decline the leftover cephalexin and explain why in plain terms: his childhood reaction was severe, cephalosporins may share allergy risk, and leftover antibiotics may be expired, dosed incorrectly, or mismatched to the current organism. Reinforce that self-treating can mask worsening infection and promote resistance. Offer a clear alternative prescription so he does not feel dismissed, and explain the specific signs that would prompt urgent return. Document the counseling and his understanding. If he is reluctant, explore cost or access barriers, since those often drive requests to reuse antibiotics. Also note the allergy in the chart with the reaction details so future clinicians can make informed choices, and offer referral for allergy testing to clarify whether he truly cannot receive beta-lactams. This converts a prescribing disagreement into a safety conversation without abandoning his preference.