Which Source to Trust
For a media-studies assignment, Priya must write one paragraph explaining whether a new city bylaw will affect students. She finds four sources. Source A is a city press release dated last week saying the bylaw 'may apply to some public spaces.' Source B is a local news article from two days ago quoting the city clerk: 'The bylaw takes effect June 1 and covers all municipal parks.' Source C is a student blog post from last year saying the bylaw 'will probably be delayed.' Source D is the bylaw's official text on the city website, dated three months ago, which states the effective date is June 1 and lists covered locations, including parks. Priya's paragraph is due tomorrow. Her teacher requires at least one source and says sources must be current and authoritative.
1. Rank the sources and choose the best one for Priya's paragraph. Explain your reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Rank by two criteria the teacher named: current and authoritative.
Source D (official bylaw text) is the most authoritative because it is the law itself, and it is specific: effective June 1, lists parks. It is three months old but laws do not change without notice, and its content matches Source B.
Source B (news quoting the clerk, two days old) is current and fairly authoritative, and it agrees with D on the June 1 date and park coverage. It is a strong supporting source.
Source A (press release, last week) is current but vague - 'may apply to some public spaces' - so it is weak for a clear answer.
Source C (student blog, last year) is old, unofficial, and speculative ('probably be delayed'), and it is contradicted by both B and D.
Best choice: use D as the main source, with B as confirmation. The judgment tested is preferring primary, specific, consistent sources over vague or outdated ones - not simply picking the newest.
2. Source C says the bylaw will probably be delayed, but Source D says it takes effect June 1. How should Priya handle this conflict in her paragraph?
Read the worked answer
She should not treat both claims as equally reliable. Source D is the official text, and Source B - a recent quote from the city clerk - confirms the June 1 date. Source C is a year-old student blog using 'probably,' a guess with no authority behind it.
So Priya should rely on the June 1 date and may briefly note that older speculation about a delay is not supported by current official information. She should not present the delay as a live possibility, because nothing current supports it.
The skill tested is resolving conflicting sources by weighing authority and recency, and by checking whether one claim is corroborated while the other is only speculation.