The Nursing Home Resident Who Cannot Consent Alone
An 84-year-old woman in a nursing home has moderate dementia and a recent hip fracture. The facility's therapy director requests a custom hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis to 'keep her from falling' and asks you to bill it to Medicare. The resident cannot clearly state her own goals; her son is her healthcare proxy but is out of state and has not been reached. The facility says the device is 'urgently needed' and asks you to start fabrication and 'sort out the paperwork later.' You notice the chart lists a do-not-resuscitate order and a history of pressure injuries over the sacrum.
1. What ethical and consent issues does this request raise?
Read the worked answer
The request is being driven by the facility's fall-prevention concern, not by a documented patient goal, and the patient cannot consent for herself. That makes surrogate involvement and a proper assessment of benefit versus burden essential before fabrication.
Key issues: (1) consent/decision-making authority - the son is the proxy and must be engaged, with the facility's social work support; (2) appropriateness - a hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis is a substantial burden for a frail resident with dementia and a sacral pressure history, and 'preventing falls' is not by itself an indication; (3) billing integrity - starting fabrication to 'sort out paperwork later' risks a claim that is not supported by documentation or medical necessity.
Proceeding without consent or a documented plan would be a professional-conduct problem, not just an administrative one.
2. How do you proceed while respecting the urgency the facility claims?
Read the worked answer
Separate true urgency from convenience. Ask what clinical change prompted the request and what the therapy team has already tried (e.g., a prefabricated device, gait belt, staffing changes). A device is rarely the only fall-prevention tool.
Contact the son (and the facility social worker) to establish the proxy decision, explain benefits and burdens in plain language, and document the discussion. If the son cannot be reached promptly, document attempts and do not fabricate a device requiring consent in the meantime; offer interim low-risk measures.
Only after a documented assessment and consent should fabrication and billing proceed. Keep the medical record clear about who decided what and why.
3. What documentation and billing safeguards apply if the device is eventually made?
Read the worked answer
Document the assessment findings, the patient's (and proxy's) goals, the rationale for the specific device, alternatives considered, and the consent discussion. The medical necessity must be supported by the record, not by the facility's request.
Bill only for what is delivered and medically necessary, with correct codes and dates; never bill in advance of delivery or before consent is documented. Keep the prescription and any physician orders in the chart.
If the device is later deemed inappropriate, document the reassessment and any return or modification. Transparency in the record protects the patient and the practitioner.