The Missing Counter-Argument
A Grade 6 student, Malik, submits a persuasive essay arguing that his school should ban single-use plastic water bottles from the cafeteria. His draft opens with a vivid anecdote about a sea turtle, states his thesis clearly in the second paragraph, and provides three reasons: plastic harms wildlife, plastic waste costs the school money in disposal fees, and refillable bottles are healthier. Each reason is supported by a statistic he found on a school-approved environmental website. The essay is well organized, uses transitions, and ends with a call to action. However, his teacher notices that Malik never mentions the counter-argument that some students rely on bottled water because the school's water fountains are old and often break down. The teacher's rubric requires students to acknowledge at least one opposing viewpoint and respond to it. Malik argues that adding a counter-argument would weaken his position and confuse readers. The essay is due tomorrow, and Malik has one class period (45 minutes) to revise. His teacher wants him to understand why addressing the counter-argument strengthens rather than weakens persuasive writing.
1. Explain to Malik why acknowledging the opposing viewpoint about unreliable water fountains would strengthen his essay rather than weaken it. Use specific details from his essay to support your reasoning.
Read the worked answer
Acknowledging the counter-argument strengthens Malik's essay because it shows readers he has considered the full issue and can respond thoughtfully, which builds credibility. If Malik ignores the fact that some students depend on bottled water because fountains break down, a reader who knows about the broken fountains may distrust his argument or dismiss it as one-sided.
By naming the concern and responding to it, Malik can turn an objection into support. For example, he could write: 'Some students worry that banning bottles leaves them without water when fountains fail. This is a real concern, and it is exactly why the school should pair the ban with a plan to repair and maintain fountains before the policy begins.' This response shows he is not ignoring a practical problem; he is proposing a solution, which makes his call to action more realistic and persuasive.
Addressing the counter-argument also fits the structure he already has. His three reasons (wildlife, cost, health) are strong, but they only show one side. Adding a brief paragraph before his conclusion would not confuse readers; it would answer the question many readers will already be asking. The rubric requires it because persuasive writing is judged on how well it handles complexity, not on whether it hides inconvenient facts.
2. Malik has 45 minutes to revise. Propose a concrete revision plan that adds the counter-argument and response without disrupting his existing organization, and explain why your plan fits the time limit.
Read the worked answer
A practical plan is to insert one short paragraph (about four to six sentences) between his third reason and his conclusion. The paragraph should: (1) state the opposing concern in one sentence, (2) acknowledge why it matters, and (3) respond with a specific solution, such as a phased ban that begins only after fountains are repaired and a maintenance schedule is published.
This fits the 45-minute limit because Malik does not need to rewrite his introduction, thesis, or three body paragraphs. He only drafts and edits one new paragraph. He can spend about 10 minutes drafting it, 10 minutes checking that it connects smoothly to the paragraph before and the conclusion after, and 15 minutes rereading the whole essay for flow and grammar. The remaining 10 minutes can be used to verify that his new paragraph directly answers the concern rather than drifting into a new topic.
Keeping the change small also protects the strengths of his draft: the vivid opening, clear thesis, and supported reasons stay intact. The revision adds complexity where it belongs, near the end, and leads naturally into a revised call to action that asks the school to fix fountains as part of the ban.