A refusal lost at the shift change
A fictional restaurant patron has been refused further alcohol service after staff observe a developing pattern of impaired coordination and disruptive conduct. The outgoing server records the concern but leaves before telling the incoming team. The patron then orders from a different staff member, while a companion offers to buy a round and distribute the drinks personally. The manager is available and the establishment has a procedure for communicating service restrictions. The case does not supply a measured BAC or a legal judgment about a past incident. Students must identify how a correct individual refusal can fail without team coordination and describe an appropriate factual handover without humiliating the patron or promising that an alternative beverage restores sobriety.
1. What should the team communicate?
Read the worked answer
State the service decision, objective observations and relevant actions to the responsible manager and incoming staff so the restriction is understood across the team.
2. Why does the companion order matter?
Read the worked answer
A proxy order may bypass the restriction. Staff should consider the intended recipient and maintain the service decision through the applicable procedure.