HPTC RT Exam study materials
HPTC RT Exam study resources

HPTC RT Exam: Dosimetry and Treatment Verification

HPTC RT Exam · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Dosimetry and Treatment Verification

Dosimetry and Treatment Verification tests whether you can independently confirm that planned dose is delivered dose, using hand calculations, calibrated chamber measurements, and patient-specific QA. Expect arithmetic plus judgment about action levels.

Monitor unit fundamentals

  • SSD setup: MU = prescribed dose / (output x PDD x Scp x inverse-square factor x modifier factors).
  • SAD setup: use TMR instead of PDD, with the inverse square of SAD over depth, plus the collimator factor.
  • TG-51 reference conditions: 10 cm depth in water, 10 x 10 cm field, 100 cm SSD for photons, with N-sub-D,w from an accredited laboratory.

Chamber corrections

  • Temperature-pressure: P-TP = ((273.2 + T)/295.2) x (101.33/P), with T in degrees Celsius and P in kPa.
  • Also apply ion-recombination, polarity, electrometer, and gradient corrections as applicable; the gradient correction is unity for photons at 10 cm.

Verification tools

  • Independent MU second check agreeing within 2-3 percent (tighter for non-IMRT, looser for IMRT and VMAT).
  • Patient-specific IMRT/VMAT QA with gamma analysis: TG-218 recommends 3 percent/2 mm, 10 percent dose threshold, 95 percent pass rate under global normalization.
  • In vivo dosimetry (diodes, OSL, EPID) with action levels near 5 percent; ICRU targets about 5 percent overall delivered-dose accuracy.

Worked example

Prescription 200 cGy at 10 cm depth, 6 MV, 100 cm SSD, 10 x 10 cm open field, PDD(10) = 66.5 percent, Scp = 1.000, output 1.000 cGy/MU. MU = 200 / (1.000 x 0.665 x 1.000) = 301 MU. If a 15-degree wedge with factor 0.700 is added, MU = 200 / (0.665 x 0.700) = 430 MU, so the wedge costs roughly 43 percent more monitor units.

Traps

  • Omitting the inverse-square term when depth or SSD differs from the calibration geometry.
  • Using PDD in an SAD calculation instead of TMR.
  • Reporting a pass rate obtained with local normalization as if it were global.
  • Treating a 95 percent gamma pass as proof of accuracy when the wrong structure, shift, or plan version was tested.