Transportation of Dangerous Goods study materials
Transportation of Dangerous Goods study resources

The LTL Load with a Thin Paper Trail

Transportation of Dangerous Goods · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The LTL Load with a Thin Paper Trail

At 06:40, a consignor loads a carrier's trailer at its Toronto dock. The load contains 12 closed-head drums of UN1263 PAINT, Class 3, PG II, each 20 L (net 18 kg), and 6 fibreboard boxes of UN3077 ENVIRONMENTALLY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE, SOLID, N.O.S., Class 9, PG III, each 10 kg. The bill of lading reads: 'Paint, 12 drums, 216 kg; emergency tel. 416-555-0100.' The telephone is answered by a receptionist who says she has no technical information and cannot reach anyone after 17:00. The document also omits the consignor's name and the number of packages for the Class 3 entry. The driver notices that the Class 9 boxes are not listed, but signs because the dispatcher says the load is 'mostly paint.' The trailer has no placards. The carrier plans to travel 420 km, crossing into Quebec. The carrier's dangerous goods training records are kept at head office.

1. Identify the deficiencies in the shipping document and explain the legal consequences for the consignor, carrier, and driver.

Read the worked answer

The document fails Part 3 of the TDG Regulations. For each dangerous good it must show the consignor's name and address, the date, the UN number, the proper shipping name, the primary class, the packing group, the number of packages, the quantity, and a 24-hour emergency telephone number monitored by a person who can provide technical information and has access to the emergency response assistance plan where one is required. The Class 9 entry is missing entirely. The Class 3 entry lacks the UN number, class, packing group, and package count. The emergency number is not a technical line.

The consignor is responsible for providing an accurate document. The carrier must not accept a deficient document, and the driver's signature does not cure the defect. The driver should refuse to depart until the document is corrected. The carrier also needs the information to decide placarding and to respond to an incident. A roadside inspection could result in detention and charges.

2. What should the driver do before departing, and are placards required for this load? Show the calculation.

Read the worked answer

The driver should require the consignor to add the Class 9 entry and complete the Class 3 entry, replace the emergency number with a 24-hour technical number, and add the consignor's name and address. The driver should also confirm that the packages are labelled and marked and that the document accompanies the load.

Placards are not required on this calculation. Class 3 is 12 drums x 18 kg = 216 kg net, or about 240 kg gross; Class 9 is 6 boxes x 10 kg = 60 kg. Neither class exceeds the 1,000 kg gross-mass placarding threshold. The trailer's lack of placards is therefore correct, but that does not excuse the document defects. The driver should not refuse the load merely because placards are absent; the refusal point is the document.

3. At a stop in Kingston, the carrier adds 40 more drums of the same paint. Does the placarding change? Explain.

Read the worked answer

Class 3 would become 12 + 40 = 52 drums. At 18 kg net each, that is 936 kg net. At roughly 20 kg gross each, it is about 1,040 kg gross. Class 9 remains 60 kg. If the threshold is applied to gross mass, the Class 3 quantity now exceeds 1,000 kg and Class 3 placards are required. If only net mass were used, 936 kg would not exceed the threshold, but placarding is based on the quantity of dangerous goods in the means of transport, normally gross mass, so the safe and correct conclusion is that Class 3 placards are required after the addition.

The carrier should verify the actual gross mass from the package weights, update the shipping document to show the added drums, and ensure the placards are displayed before the trailer moves. This is a judgment point: the added load is close enough to the threshold that guessing from net weight is risky.