Autocallable Note for a Client Who Wants Safe Income
A 70-year-old client with a $900,000 portfolio and an 18-month liquidity need is offered a 3-year autocallable note issued by an A- rated bank. The note pays an 8% annual coupon if the underlying index is at or above its initial level on a quarterly observation; it autocalls at 100% after six months. If not called and the index falls below 70% of initial at maturity, the client loses 1% for each 1% decline beyond the 30% buffer. The index dividend yield is 1.5%, implied volatility 22%, and the 3-year risk-free rate is 4%. The note has a 2.5% secondary-market bid-ask spread and no listed market. The client says she wants 'safe income' and does not want to lose principal.
1. Evaluate the suitability of the autocallable note for this client.
Read the worked answer
The note is unsuitable as a core 'safe income' holding. The client needs liquidity in 18 months, but the note is a 3-year instrument with no listed market and a 2.5% bid-ask spread, so an early sale could realize a material loss. The client explicitly does not want principal loss, yet the note has meaningful downside: below 70% of the initial index level at maturity, losses are 1-for-1 beyond the buffer. The 8% coupon is not comparable to a risk-free yield; it compensates for selling downside protection and for autocall risk. Issuer credit risk is also present because the note is an unsecured obligation of an A- rated bank. The note may be callable early, so the client may not receive the 8% for the full 3 years. For this investor, the mismatch in liquidity, principal protection, and complexity is decisive.
2. Decompose the note's economics and explain what a suitable alternative might look like.
Read the worked answer
The note can be decomposed into a bond plus a sold put or downside participation plus an autocall feature. The 8% coupon is partly compensation for the embedded short optionality: the investor gives up upside above any cap and bears losses beyond the 30% buffer. The 4% risk-free rate and 1.5% dividend yield imply that a plain 3-year Treasury or high-quality bond could produce a known return without equity downside. With 22% implied volatility, the option component is valuable to the issuer, which is why the coupon looks attractive. A suitable alternative for an 18-month liquidity need would be a Treasury ladder, CDs, or a short-duration high-quality bond portfolio, possibly with a small, clearly disclosed equity allocation if the client can tolerate volatility. If the client still wants the note, she should understand that it is not principal-protected, may be illiquid, and could return less than 4% risk-free.