Eight-Year-Old With "Doesn't Listen" Referral
You are a school psychologist screening an 8-year-old boy in a busy Title I school. Hearing screening is normal and he is a monolingual English speaker. On the forward digit span he repeats 4 digits correctly but fails at 5; backward span is 2. On a sentence repetition task he scores 6/10, with omissions concentrated at the ends of sentences and substitutions of similar-sounding words. Nonword repetition is 5/10. His teacher reports he "doesn't listen" and misses multi-step directions, but his mother says he remembers weekend plans and recites movie lines accurately. Auditory comprehension on a standard language measure is within normal limits. The referral question is whether this is a memory problem, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or a language difference. You have one 30-minute session before the team meeting and need a defensible formulation.
1. Interpret the forward span, backward span, sentence repetition, and nonword repetition profile. What construct does each tap, and what is the most parsimonious formulation?
Read the worked answer
Forward digit span is the cleanest available index of phonological short-term or immediate memory: 4 is below the typical span of about 5-6 at age 8, though not severely. Backward span adds manipulation and attention, so 2 is consistent with the same weakness plus executive load; it is not independent evidence of ADHD. Sentence repetition taps phonological immediate memory plus language knowledge; end-of-sentence omissions suggest the trace decays over the sentence, and similar-sounding substitutions suggest phonological coding errors. Nonword repetition reduces lexical support and is a relatively specific measure of the phonological store; 5/10 supports a storage weakness. The parsimonious formulation is mild phonological short-term memory weakness, not global memory failure: intact comprehension and recall of meaningful movie lines show long-term semantic memory is fine. Attention is a plausible modifier, but the profile is memory-specific.
2. The teacher wants an ADHD referral. What evidence would you gather to support or refute that, and what confounds must be ruled out before the team meeting?
Read the worked answer
To support ADHD you would need cross-setting, cross-informant evidence of inattention and/or hyperactivity that is impairing and pervasive, with onset before age 12, plus rule-outs. Here the teacher's "doesn't listen" is a symptom description, not a diagnosis; it is equally explained by a phonological storage limit that makes long instructions decay. Gather teacher and parent rating scales, classroom observation of on-task behavior during low- versus high-verbal-load tasks, and a work sample showing whether errors cluster on multi-step verbal directions. Rule out hearing (done), language exposure, anxiety, sleep problems, medication effects, and test anxiety; also check whether apparent inattention improves when instructions are written or chunked. If it does, memory load is driving the behavior. Do not let a single 30-minute session or a 4-digit span become the basis for an ADHD diagnosis.
3. What classroom accommodations follow from your formulation, and why are they preferable to memory training?
Read the worked answer
Accommodations should reduce phonological storage load: give one instruction at a time, chunk multi-step directions into two or three steps with a visual checklist, have the child repeat back the instruction, write key steps on the board, and seat him near the teacher for speech clarity. Allow a cue card with the steps and check in after 30 seconds. These are preferable to generic memory training because they target the bottleneck at the point of performance and do not assume transfer from drill to classroom. If the team wants a direct intervention, use rehearsal and chunking strategies taught on classroom content, with progress monitored by the number of correctly completed steps after a verbal direction. Reassess span in six months; a 4-digit span with intact comprehension is a weak signal, not a prognosis.