Asset-Based Value with Environmental Liability and Idle Capacity
You are valuing 100% of the equity of a steel fabricator at December 31, 2025. The net book value of property, plant, and equipment is $8,000,000. An appraisal shows replacement cost new of $18,000,000, physical depreciation of 55%, and functional obsolescence of 10% attributable to excess capacity. Land is appraised at $2,000,000. The company carries a $3,000,000 environmental remediation obligation that is probable and estimable but has not been accrued. A $1,000,000 standby letter of credit supports a customer performance guarantee and has not been drawn. The company also owns vacant land appraised at $1,500,000 and antique machinery with a liquidation value of $200,000, neither of which is used in operations. Normalized working capital is $2,000,000 versus a book balance of $2,800,000. An income approach indicates an enterprise value of $12,000,000.
1. Compute an asset-based value of equity, showing all adjustments.
Read the worked answer
Start with the operating PP&E. Replacement cost new is $18,000,000. Apply physical depreciation of 55%: $18,000,000 × (1 − 55%) = $8,100,000. Apply functional obsolescence of 10%: $8,100,000 × (1 − 10%) = $7,290,000. Add land of $2,000,000, giving operating assets of $9,290,000.
Add redundant assets: vacant land $1,500,000 + antique machinery $200,000 = $1,700,000. Add normalized working capital of $2,000,000, not the $2,800,000 book balance, because the excess $800,000 is either non-operating or not required. Total assets before liabilities = $9,290,000 + $1,700,000 + $2,000,000 = $12,990,000.
Subtract the probable environmental liability of $3,000,000: $12,990,000 − $3,000,000 = $9,990,000. The standby letter of credit is not deducted because it is undrawn and is a contingent support instrument, not a liability; it should be disclosed. No interest-bearing debt is stated, so equity value under the asset-based approach is approximately $9,990,000 before any tax adjustment for the environmental liability.
2. Reconcile the asset-based result with the $12,000,000 income-approach enterprise value.
Read the worked answer
The asset-based equity value of approximately $9,990,000 is a floor-oriented indication. The income approach produces an enterprise value of $12,000,000. To compare the two, the analyst must ensure that both include the same assets and liabilities. If the income approach value is for the operating business only, add the redundant assets of $1,700,000 and subtract the environmental liability of $3,000,000 to get an adjusted income-approach equity value of $10,700,000, assuming no debt. That is close to the asset-based result.
If the $12,000,000 already includes the redundant assets, then the comparison is $12,000,000 versus $9,990,000, and the $2,010,000 difference represents goodwill, customer relationships, assembled workforce, and going-concern value that the asset approach does not capture. The analyst should not simply average the two. The asset-based approach is most relevant as a floor or in a liquidation premise; the income approach is more relevant for a going concern. The conclusion should explain which premise is appropriate and reconcile the difference explicitly.
3. Discuss the treatment of the environmental liability and the letter of credit.
Read the worked answer
The environmental liability is probable and estimable, so it should be recognized as a liability in both the asset-based and income-approach valuations. If the remediation is tax-deductible, the liability should be recorded on an after-tax basis; if not, the full $3,000,000 reduces value. The analyst should also consider the timing of the cash outflows and discount a multi-year remediation schedule to present value rather than deducting the undiscounted amount. The fact that it has not been accrued on the balance sheet does not make it less real.
The standby letter of credit is a contingent obligation. Because it has not been drawn, it is not a liability on the valuation date. However, it restricts the company's borrowing capacity and may require cash collateral, which affects liquidity and possibly the discount rate. If the letter of credit is drawn after the valuation date because the performance guarantee is called, that may be a subsequent event that provides evidence of a condition existing at the valuation date. The analyst should disclose the $1,000,000 facility and explain why it is not deducted, while considering any fee or collateral impact in the income approach.