CCHP-CP study materials
CCHP-CP study resources

Chest Pain During Count in a Single-Nurse Prison

CCHP-CP · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Chest Pain During Count in a Single-Nurse Prison

At 22:10 during count in a 180-bed prison, a 52-year-old man with hypertension and a prior myocardial infarction at age 48 reports crushing substernal chest pain that began 25 minutes ago while lying on his bunk. He is diaphoretic and nauseated. Vital signs: BP 100/64, HR 118, RR 24, SpO2 92% on room air, temperature 36.8 C. The nurse is the only clinician on site; EMS is 12 minutes away; the AED is mounted in the control room. The officer tells the nurse that count is in progress and the patient cannot leave the unit until the count clears, which may take 10 minutes. The facility has aspirin and nitroglycerin in the emergency kit but no on-site ECG. The nurse must initiate emergency care and coordinate with custody.

1. What are the immediate clinical priorities, and how should the nurse handle the count delay?

Read the worked answer

This is a time-critical possible acute coronary syndrome. The count is an administrative security process, not a reason to delay emergency care. The nurse should call the control room, state that there is a medical emergency, and request immediate release from the unit with an escort. If the officer refuses, the nurse should escalate to the shift supervisor and document the refusal and the time. Clinical priorities are: position the patient at rest, give oxygen if SpO2 remains below 94% or if ordered, obtain a repeat set of vitals, and prepare the AED. Aspirin 325 mg chewed is indicated if there is no allergy or active bleeding. Nitroglycerin is cautionary here because the systolic blood pressure is 100 mmHg; many protocols withhold it if systolic is below 100 or if there is suspected right ventricular infarction. Do not wait for an ECG that is not available on site. Call EMS and arrange a transfer route that minimizes delay. The nurse should stay with the patient and keep the AED nearby.

2. What should the nurse do about medications and monitoring while awaiting EMS?

Read the worked answer

While waiting for EMS, the nurse should reassess vital signs every 5 minutes, monitor mental status, and be prepared to start CPR. If the patient becomes unresponsive and the AED advises a shock, follow the device prompts. Aspirin should be given early if not contraindicated. Nitroglycerin should be withheld unless the provider or protocol authorizes it and the systolic blood pressure is adequate; a drop from 100 mmHg could cause harm. If the patient has an aspirin allergy, document it and do not give it. Oxygen should be titrated to the target saturation rather than given routinely at high flow. The nurse should not give opioids for pain without an order if it could mask symptoms or cause hypotension, but follow local protocol. Keep the patient NPO in case of transfer for procedures. Record the exact times of symptom onset, first contact, aspirin, EMS notification, and transfer. The handoff report should include the history of prior MI and current medications.

3. What documentation and post-event review issues does this case raise?

Read the worked answer

Documentation should be contemporaneous and specific: symptom onset at 21:45, nurse arrival, vital signs, interventions, count-delay conversation, supervisor notification, EMS arrival, and transfer. Note who was present and what was said. After the event, the nurse should participate in a debrief and review whether the emergency response plan worked: AED location, EMS access, count override policy, and communication. The case also raises a standards issue: facilities must have an emergency plan and staff trained to respond, and security procedures must not block urgent care. If the count delay was due to a policy gap, report it through the quality improvement process. The nurse should not alter the record after the fact; add a late entry if needed with the date and time. Follow up on the patient's outcome and document it in the record if information is available. The review should be systems-focused, not blame-focused.