RCCS study materials
RCCS study resources

A 12 mm ASD, a Dilated Right Ventricle and a Qp/Qs of 1.4

RCCS · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A 12 mm ASD, a Dilated Right Ventricle and a Qp/Qs of 1.4

A 7-year-old, 24 kg girl is referred after a murmur. She is asymptomatic and growing normally. Echocardiography shows a 12 mm secundum atrial septal defect with a 1.0 m/s left-to-right colour jet, right ventricular basal dimension 3.4 cm, LV end-diastolic dimension 3.6 cm, right atrial dilation, and a main pulmonary artery larger than the aorta. Doppler Qp/Qs is calculated at 1.4 using an RVOT diameter of 1.2 cm with VTI 13 cm and an LVOT diameter of 1.0 cm with VTI 13 cm. All four pulmonary veins are seen entering the left atrium. There is no tricuspid regurgitation and estimated RVSP is 26 mmHg. The parents want to know whether the hole needs closing.

1. Reproduce the Qp/Qs calculation and explain the discrepancy between a ratio of 1.4 and a visibly dilated right ventricle.

Read the worked answer

Calculation: Qp = pi x (0.6)^2 x 13 = 1.131 x 13 = 14.7 mL/beat. Qs = pi x (0.5)^2 x 13 = 0.785 x 13 = 10.2 mL/beat. Qp/Qs = 14.7/10.2 = 1.44, i.e. 1.4.

The discrepancy is expected and is the crux of the case. A Qp/Qs of 1.4 is only modestly above normal, yet the RV is dilated and the pulmonary artery is bigger than the aorta - findings that imply a larger shunt. The reasons:

  • Diameter error dominates. Area varies with the square of the radius. At an RVOT of 1.2 cm, a 1 mm error alters the pulmonary area by roughly -16% or +17% and moves Qp/Qs by about 0.25 in each direction. Two such errors in opposite directions easily turn 1.9 into 1.4.
  • The RVOT is a poor measurement site. It is distensible, changes diameter through systole, and in the presence of an ASD its flow profile is distorted by the shunt stream.
  • Shunt flow itself is not measured. Any error in the assumed flows is not corrected by the shunt jet velocity - the 1.0 m/s across the defect simply reflects a 4 mmHg interatrial gradient.
  • Doppler Qp/Qs is least reliable at small shunt fractions, which is exactly the borderline range where the decision matters.

So the number and the morphology are telling different stories, and I would not let the number overrule the anatomy.

2. Which adjunctive indices would raise your confidence that this ASD is haemodynamically significant, and which findings would argue against it?

Read the worked answer

Supporting significance:

  • RV basal dimension of 3.4 cm against an LV of 3.6 cm - an RV/LV ratio near 0.95, well above the normal paediatric value of roughly 0.7-0.8, and RV dimensions should be indexed to body surface area and expressed as z-scores.
  • Right atrial dilation and a main pulmonary artery larger than the aorta.
  • Diastolic septal flattening or a 'D-shaped' LV in diastole, indicating RV volume loading rather than pressure loading.
  • A colour jet width that is a large fraction of the defect diameter, and a defect large enough that it is unrestrictive by inspection.
  • Normal or only mildly elevated RVSP (26 mmHg) fits a high-flow, low-resistance shunt rather than pulmonary vascular disease.

Arguing against:

  • A small, restrictive defect with a narrow colour jet and a high trans-defect velocity gradient.
  • Normal RV and RA dimensions when indexed to BSA, and normal septal motion.
  • An alternative explanation for RV dilation - pulmonary regurgitation, a sinus venosus defect with anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, or pulmonary hypertension.

In a child whose RV is dilated but whose Doppler shunt fraction is borderline, the morphology of volume loading is the more reliable signal.

3. Would you recommend closure on these data, and if not, what would you do next?

Read the worked answer

Not on these data alone - this is borderline and needs one more measurement, not a decision.

Reasoning: the accepted threshold for closing an asymptomatic secundum ASD is Qp/Qs of about 1.5 or greater together with right heart enlargement, or documented right heart enlargement with a shunt fraction that is not clearly trivial. Here we have the enlargement but a shunt fraction of 1.4 that sits inside the measurement error of the technique. A 12 mm defect in a 7-year-old is unlikely to close spontaneously, so the question is timing rather than whether, but an unnecessary or premature closure in a truly small shunt has its own consequences.

Next steps:

  • Repeat the Doppler measurement with the RVOT diameter taken in mid-systole at the annulus with inner-edge-to-inner-edge technique, averaging 3-5 beats, and quote a range rather than a single figure.
  • Confirm the defect subtype - exclude a sinus venosus defect with partial anomalous pulmonary venous return, which a transthoracic study can miss and which changes the operation.
  • If the decision remains unclear, obtain cardiac MRI (or a shunt study at catheterisation) for direct measurement of RV end-diastolic volume index and shunt fraction.
  • Proceed to closure if RV end-diastolic volume index is more than 2 SD above normal or MRI confirms Qp/Qs of 1.5 or greater; otherwise follow with serial imaging, since the child is asymptomatic and growing.