Escalation Requests at the Border of Viability
A 23 6/7-week, 560-g female infant is born after spontaneous preterm labor to a 19-year-old Spanish-speaking mother and 21-year-old father; no antenatal steroids were given. She is intubated in the delivery room and receives surfactant. On day 5, cranial ultrasound shows bilateral grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage with evolving posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. She has clinical seizures, is on dopamine 10 mcg/kg/min, FiO2 0.45, mean airway pressure 9 cm H2O, lactate 6 mmol/L, urine output 0.5 mL/kg/h, and aEEG shows burst suppression. The parents, who are devoutly religious, say through an interpreter, “Do everything; we believe in miracles.” The attending neonatologist tells the nurse, “I think we should transition to comfort care; there is no meaningful chance of survival.” The nurse feels torn and worries about moral distress.
1. How should the nurse prepare for and participate in the family meeting? Include communication, cultural, and ethical considerations.
Read the worked answer
Prepare: review the chart, clarify the medical facts with the attending, arrange a professional interpreter, and ensure both parents can attend. Ask the parents what they understand and what “doing everything” means to them. Explore their religious beliefs and goals-for example, does “everything” include CPR, surgery, tracheostomy, or long-term ventilation? Explain: grade IV intraventricular hemorrhage with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus and burst suppression carries a high risk of severe disability and death; present the uncertain range honestly, not a single outcome. Avoid saying “nothing more can be done”; reframe as a shift in goals if comfort care is chosen. Ethically: support shared decision-making, not unilateral withdrawal. Offer chaplaincy and palliative care. Document the discussion. The nurse advocates for the infant's interests and the family's values.
2. What if the parents insist on full resuscitation and the team believes it would be non-beneficial? Describe a process, including the nurse's role and limits of parental authority.
Read the worked answer
Parental authority is broad but not absolute; the standard is the infant's best interests. Process: obtain a second neonatology opinion; request an ethics consultation; follow institutional conflict-resolution policy; consider a time-limited trial of intensive care with explicit reassessment criteria. Do not impose a DNR unilaterally. If the team believes CPR would be non-beneficial, that must be discussed transparently, with reasons, and reviewed through ethics and legal channels if disagreement persists. Nurse's role: voice concerns through the chain of command, document, and continue comfort-focused care. If asked to provide care that conflicts with professional integrity, discuss with the manager; transfer of care may be possible, but abandonment is not.
3. What signs of moral distress might the nurse show, and what supports should be offered?
Read the worked answer
Signs: irritability, withdrawal, guilt, sleep disturbance, physical symptoms, avoidance of the family or infant, decreased empathy, and a sense of powerlessness. Supports: a structured debrief after the meeting, ethics consultation, employee assistance or counseling, peer support, and reflective practice. The nurse should not be blamed for experiencing distress; the goal is to restore the ability to provide nonjudgmental care. Escalate if distress is impairing practice or causing unsafe care.