0230 Conflict Between a Written Directive, a Surrogate, and an Off-Site Attending
You are the night nursing supervisor in a 210-bed community hospital and the person staff call for ethical conflicts after hours. It is 0230. The patient in room 214 is an 84-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic cancer admitted with aspiration pneumonia and sepsis. He has a signed physician order for scope of treatment form and a living will, both executed six months ago, stating do not intubate, do not attempt resuscitation, and comfort-focused care. He is now in respiratory distress: respiratory rate 38, SpO2 84% on a 15 L nonrebreather, drowsy but arousable and answering yes/no appropriately. His daughter, who holds his durable power of attorney for health care, is at the bedside saying, 'Do everything - intubate him. He didn't know what he was signing.' His son, on speakerphone, says, 'He told me last week he didn't want a tube.' The attending is off-site and reachable by phone; he tells you, 'Just do what the daughter wants, I'll be in at 0700.' The bedside nurse is crying and asking you what to do.
1. What are your priority actions in the next 30 minutes, and on what ethical framework do they rest?
Read the worked answer
The patient's own previously expressed wishes govern, not the surrogate's preferences - and right now the patient may still be able to speak for himself.
First, go to the bedside and assess decision-making capacity for this specific decision. He is drowsy but answering yes/no appropriately, which is not the same as lacking capacity. Ask him, plainly and privately, what he understands about his breathing and whether he wants a breathing tube. If he can express a consistent choice, that choice controls everything and the conflict dissolves.
Simultaneously, treat his distress. Morphine for air hunger, oxygen by the most tolerable interface, upright positioning, fan, and reassurance are not contingent on resolving the code status question. Untreated dyspnea is a harm you can prevent while the conflict is being worked.
If he cannot participate, the surrogate is obligated to apply the substituted judgment standard - what would he have chosen - and she has a signed directive, a document she can read, and a brother who corroborates it. Her authority is to interpret his wishes, not to override them. Do not intubate while a valid do-not-intubate order stands and the patient's wishes are documented, unless the patient himself asks.
2. The attending physician says, 'Just do what the daughter wants.' How do you handle that instruction?
Read the worked answer
You do not carry out an order that conflicts with a valid, patient-signed scope-of-treatment form - you escalate the conflict instead.
Say it plainly and without accusation: 'Doctor, I can't intubate him on that instruction. He has a signed do-not-intubate form and a living will in the chart, he can still answer questions, and his son reports the same wish. If you want to change the plan, I need you to come in and document the rationale and the conversation.' Then use the chain your policy provides: the on-call intensivist or hospitalist covering tonight, then the on-call administrator and the chief medical officer, then the ethics committee chair by phone. Most hospitals maintain a 24-hour ethics reach number for exactly this hour.
Do not simply refuse and stop there. Escalating means someone with authority makes and owns a documented decision, and it protects both the patient and the bedside nurse.
The daughter's distress is real and deserves a response, not a lecture: acknowledge that watching a parent struggle to breathe is terrifying, then explain that the team will treat his breathing and keep him comfortable, and that the tube is the one thing the document forbids. Offer hospital chaplaincy or social work tonight. In the morning, request an interdisciplinary family meeting with palliative care.
3. How do you support the bedside nurse tonight, and what gets documented?
Read the worked answer
Protect the nurse from carrying an unresolved moral dilemma alone, and make the record reflect reasoning, not just orders.
Tell her explicitly that she is not expected to decide this, and that you are now the point of contact for the daughter. Offer to take the family conversation yourself while she stays with the patient and manages comfort - that splits the two tasks that are hardest to do at once. Ask whether she wants to hand off the room, and treat that as a legitimate request rather than a failure. Arrange a brief debrief before the end of shift, and connect her to the employee assistance or peer support program if she is still distressed.
Documentation should include: the patient's capacity assessment and what he said in his own words, the existing directive and where it is physically located, the surrogate's statements and yours, the names and times of every person you escalated to, the physician's instruction verbatim, and the comfort measures provided with their effect. Record the ethical reasoning briefly - the surrogate is applying substituted judgment and the team is honoring the patient's documented wish. An order change, if one occurs, must come from the attending in writing with rationale. Notify risk management in the morning, and request an ethics consult even if the immediate conflict resolves, because tomorrow's family meeting will revisit it.