CDI study materials
CDI study resources

A DeafBlind participant and a changing meeting setup

CDI · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

A DeafBlind participant and a changing meeting setup

A DeafBlind participant has explained that a restricted visual signing space works for some discussion and that an agreed tactile approach may be useful when visual fatigue increases. The event organizer nevertheless describes all DeafBlind access as one standard method. During the meeting, lighting is reduced for slides, several speakers change turns without identifying themselves, and a participant enters unnoticed. The interpreter begins describing so many room details that the main conversation becomes difficult to follow. Later, the consumer requests a different contact arrangement and a pause because the current position is uncomfortable. The team must respect individual preferences, consent, information priorities, physical comfort, and the distinction between environmental support and the substantive interpreted message.

1. Which assumptions and access barriers should be addressed?

Read the worked answer

Do not impose one universal method. Reassess lighting, signing space, speaker identification, relevant arrivals, and the person’s updated preferences. Use only approaches within competence, with current consent and a sustainable physical arrangement.

2. How should environmental information be balanced?

Read the worked answer

Agree on relevant information, timing, and priorities with the participant. Provide context that supports participation without overwhelming the main interaction or inventing universal meanings for touch signals. Coordinate breaks and changes transparently with the team.