The Emergency Nurse After a Patient Assault
Marcus is a 34-year-old emergency department RN with eight years at a 400-bed trauma center. Six weeks ago a patient in alcohol withdrawal punched him, fracturing his orbital rim. He returned after two weeks but now has a PTSD diagnosis from a psychiatrist: nightmares, hypervigilance, and panic when assigned to the psychiatric holding area. The psychiatrist's note says: no night rotation for 12 weeks, no assignment to the psych holding area or to patients with active agitation, and up to two unscheduled absences per month for treatment. The unit runs 12-hour rotating shifts and every nurse rotates nights. Marcus told his charge nurse only that he has 'a medical condition,' but his manager has heard rumors and asks the disability manager for the diagnosis and the psychiatrist's note. Co-workers have begun trading shifts for him.
1. How should the disability manager respond to the manager's request for the diagnosis and the psychiatrist's note?
Read the worked answer
The manager should not receive the diagnosis or the note. Under the ADA, medical information is confidential and shared only with those who need to know to implement an accommodation or respond to a request.
A supervisor typically needs three things: that the employee has a condition requiring accommodation, what the work restrictions are, and what the unit must do differently. Nothing else.
A usable script: 'Marcus has a medical condition that requires temporary restrictions. For the next 12 weeks he cannot work night rotation, cannot be assigned to psych holding or actively agitated patients, and may need up to two absences a month for treatment. Please treat this as confidential medical information.'
Do not confirm or deny rumors, do not use the PTSD label unless Marcus authorizes it, and do not place the note in unit files or a shared drive. HR and the disability manager are the custodians; the record stays in the confidential medical file.
Two risks worth flagging. First, psychiatric diagnoses carry stigma in an ED where fitness-for-duty concerns are taken seriously; disclosure can affect how assignments, evaluations, and even friendly teasing play out. Second, the informal shift trading is the manager's legitimate operational concern, and it can be addressed using the restrictions alone: the trading has created an inequity that needs a formal, transparent structure.
If the manager presses, escalate to HR and explain that curiosity is not a need-to-know. Document the request and the response; a supervisor asking for a diagnosis after being told no is a fact pattern that matters later.
2. Evaluate the two restrictions (no night rotation; no psych holding or agitated patients) as accommodation requests in a 24/7 unit. What is reasonable, what is not, and how should the plan be built?
Read the worked answer
Analyze the two restrictions separately, because their accommodation costs differ sharply.
Night rotation. The unit is 24/7 and every nurse rotates. A 12-week exclusion from nights requires coverage: a per-diem, volunteer swaps, or a temporary day-shift line. The request is time-limited, which weighs heavily toward reasonableness; scheduling inconvenience is not undue hardship. Options in order: (a) documented voluntary swaps, with a written structure so they do not become an informal entitlement or a contract grievance; (b) temporary assignment to a vacant day-shift position; (c) a per-diem replacement if the unit can absorb the cost.
Psych holding and agitated patients. This is narrower and easier. The ED assigns by zone and acuity, so the charge nurse can route those assignments to other staff without touching Marcus's shift. This is a task-level accommodation, not job restructuring of the position.
The limit to name. The employer is not required to eliminate an essential function. If competence in psych holding is a formal requirement of the position, a 12-week temporary exemption is still likely reasonable, but the employer should state the limitation and set a review date rather than treating the exemption as permanent.
Build one integrated plan. A day-shift line without psych assignments may be simpler than either piece alone. Put it in writing to the charge nurse with restrictions only, confirm the psychiatrist will update restrictions at 12 weeks, and calendar the review now. If Marcus is still unable to take night shifts at week 12, that is a new interactive process and a possible reason to look at vacant day-shift positions, not an automatic extension.
3. Marcus will need up to two unscheduled absences per month for treatment. How should intermittent leave be administered, and what should be done about the shift trading?
Read the worked answer
Designate it as FMLA leave, not attendance points. Two absences a month for treatment is foreseeable intermittent leave.
Steps: (1) issue the eligibility/rights notice and designation notice if not already done; (2) obtain certification supporting frequency and duration; (3) give Marcus the notice rules in writing - as soon as practicable for planned treatment, and the unit's call-in procedure for unplanned absences; (4) instruct the scheduler that FMLA absences are not counted under the attendance policy and that he cannot be required to find his own replacement as a condition of leave; (5) track absences in the increments the employer uses for other leave.
At 12 weeks, if treatment continues, run a fresh analysis. An ADA leave extension is a separate question from FMLA entitlement, and the employer should assess it individually rather than closing the file.
The shift trading needs to come into the open. Voluntary swaps are not unlawful, but the unit has effectively built a shadow accommodation. That creates two exposures: coworkers may grieve unequal treatment, and the arrangement collapses the first week nobody volunteers. The disability manager should either formalize the swaps (documented, rotated fairly, visible to the scheduler) or replace them with a scheduled accommodation, and should stop leaving a medical issue to be managed informally by the charge nurse.
Keep performance separate. FMLA-protected absences cannot support discipline, but Marcus is still accountable for the substantive work when present. Two ledgers, reviewed separately, avoids both an interference claim and a supervisor who quietly lowers expectations without telling anyone.