I85PREP
⌘ K
CSR study materials
CSR study resources

CSR: Sustainability Reporting Frameworks and Standards

CSR · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Sustainability Reporting Frameworks and Standards

Domain 1, Sustainability Reporting Frameworks and Standards, tests whether you can identify each rule-setter, say which instrument imposes requirements versus offers guidance, and select a defensible combination for a given reporter. Items commonly probe the framework/standard distinction, the status of an instrument in a jurisdiction, the materiality lens each applies, and how the major systems interoperate.

The main instruments

  • GRI Standards: Universal Standards GRI 1 (Foundation), GRI 2 (General Disclosures) and GRI 3 (Material Topics), plus topic standards in numbered series (201 Economic, 301 Materials, 401 Employment and so on). Impact-oriented and multi-stakeholder; effective for reports published from 1 January 2023.
  • ISSB: IFRS S1 General Requirements and IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures, issued June 2023, effective for annual periods beginning 1 January 2024. S1 supplies the conceptual foundations; S2 adds climate-specific requirements and industry-based metrics derived from the SASB Standards.
  • Integrated Reporting Framework: principles-based, organised around six capitals and value creation over time. It governs connectivity and presentation rather than prescribing disclosure requirements.
  • Voluntary schemes: CDP questionnaires and scores (investor- and customer-driven), UN Global Compact Communication on Progress, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises with their national contact points, ISO 26000 (guidance, explicitly not certifiable).

Framework versus standard

In ISSB terminology a framework gives principles to help prepare a report, while a standard sets requirements a reporter must meet. TCFD issued recommendations and has been consolidated into IFRS S2: describe a report as TCFD-aligned, never TCFD-compliant. IFRS S1 and S2 are positioned as a global baseline that jurisdictions adopt or build on.

Two materiality lenses

ISSB and SASB apply financial materiality: information is material if omitting it could influence primary users (investors and lenders) assessing enterprise value. GRI applies impact materiality: the organisation's most significant impacts on the economy, environment and people. CSRD/ESRS require both, which is double materiality.

Worked example

An EU-listed manufacturer reports under ESRS and receives an investor request citing SASB industry metrics. Reasoning: ESRS is the legally required baseline; ESRS and IFRS S2 are highly interoperable, so climate content can be drafted once and cross-referenced; SASB metrics remain useful because they are now ISSB industry-based guidance and can sharpen investor relevance; GRI can still cover impacts outside ESRS scope. The answer is layered, not either/or.

Traps that cost marks

  • Treating GRI and ISSB as interchangeable; they answer different questions.
  • Claiming compliance with a framework or with TCFD.
  • Citing SASB as a current independent standard-setter.
  • Assuming a single globally mandatory standard exists.