CESCO study materials
CESCO study resources

Relief Valve Release at 01:20

CESCO · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Relief Valve Release at 01:20

Northline Cold Storage operates a 14,000-pound anhydrous ammonia refrigeration system that is a PSM-covered process and an RMP Program 3 process. At 01:20 on a Sunday, a high-pressure receiver relief valve lifts and begins venting ammonia into the machine room. The night maintenance technician, who holds only awareness-level hazardous materials training, wants to enter the machine room alone in an SCBA to close the block valve. The emergency action plan says 'evacuate to the north parking lot and call 911.' The municipal fire department is 12 minutes away and has no ammonia capability; a contract hazardous materials team is 45 minutes away. Two production employees are unaccounted for. The ammonia detector at the machine room door reads 150 ppm and rising. The last drill was 26 months ago, and a similar relief-valve release three years earlier was handled internally and never reported.

1. May the technician attempt to close the valve? Explain the training and organizational rules that govern the decision.

Read the worked answer

He may not enter. At 150 ppm and rising, the machine room is immediately dangerous to life or health for ammonia, and a lone entry in an SCBA without backup, communications, or a rescue plan is an unjustified risk. It is also outside his training.

29 CFR 1910.120(q) sets response levels. Awareness-level personnel can recognize the hazard, isolate the area, evacuate, and notify, but they cannot take offensive action. Entering the release area to close a block valve is offensive action requiring technician-level training, appropriate protective equipment, medical surveillance, and a buddy or backup. PSM (1910.119(n)) also requires an emergency action plan for the covered process, and the plan on file calls for evacuation, not intervention.

The employer has two lawful postures and should pick one: run the site as an evacuate-and-call organization under 1910.38, in which no employee performs emergency response; or staff, equip, and train a response team under 1910.120(q). Immediate priorities are to sound the alarm, evacuate and account for everyone at the assembly point, call 911 and the contract team, and deny entry to the machine room. Remote isolation or ventilation may be used only if it can be done without entry.

2. Identify the notifications required after this release, with the trigger for each.

Read the worked answer

CERCLA: anhydrous ammonia has a reportable quantity of 100 pounds. A relief valve venting from a 14,000-pound system will exceed that, so the National Response Center must be called immediately.

EPCRA section 304: ammonia is an extremely hazardous substance, so the State Emergency Response Commission and the Local Emergency Planning Committee must be notified as soon as practicable after a release at or above the reportable quantity.

OSHA injury reporting: a fatality within 8 hours; an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye within 24 hours.

RMP: revise and resubmit the risk management plan within six months of the release, updating the five-year accident history. The prior internal-only handling of the earlier release was a reporting failure; both events may belong in the accident history depending on the regulatory criteria.

PSM: begin the incident investigation promptly and no later than 48 hours after the release, using a team that includes at least one employee knowledgeable in the process, and track recommendations to resolution. Check state and local rules as well, since some are stricter than the federal timelines.

3. Evaluate the emergency plan and drill history. What must be rebuilt?

Read the worked answer

A 26-month gap since the last drill is a program failure. The plan must be reviewed with employees on initial assignment and whenever their responsibilities change (1910.38), PSM requires an emergency action plan for the covered process, and RMP Program 3 requires coordination with local emergency planning and response organizations. The unaccounted-for employees show the plan lacks a workable accountability method.

Rebuild around four elements. First, two clear decision points, evacuate versus shelter-in-place, with triggers based on detector readings, wind direction, and occupancy. Second, accountability: a roster, buddy tags, or badge scan reconciled at the assembly point within a defined time. Third, drills at least annually, including a joint exercise with the fire department, followed by an after-action review with tracked corrections. Fourth, pre-incident planning with the fire department: system layout, isolation points, water supply, and the fact that the department has no ammonia capability.

Also verify the detection and alarm system and the machine-room ventilation controls, train all employees on alarm signals and reporting, and route drill findings to the safety committee with owners and due dates.