Warrantless Entry at a Domestic Disturbance
At 2:14 a.m. Sergeant Okafor is sent to a domestic disturbance at a second-floor apartment. A 34-year-old woman answers the door with a swollen lip and blood on her shirt. She says she and her boyfriend argued, he left, and she does not want police inside. She denies needing medical care. As the sergeant speaks with her, he hears three heavy thumps from upstairs and a child crying. A man's jacket and two phones are on the couch. A closed door leads to the upstairs bedrooms. The woman says her children are asleep and the noise is nothing. A records check shows no active order of protection and no prior calls at the address. The sergeant has two officers with him; one is a probationary officer. Backup is eight minutes away. The woman steps back and begins to close the door, saying, 'You can't come in.'
1. May the sergeant enter the apartment? Identify the legal theory, the facts that support and undercut it, and the permissible scope of any entry.
Read the worked answer
The entry question turns on exigent circumstances and emergency aid, not on the woman's refusal alone. The facts that support entry are: a fresh injury, blood, a recent domestic argument, heavy thumps from upstairs after the boyfriend supposedly left, a crying child, the boyfriend's jacket and phones still present, and the woman's evasiveness. The facts that cut against entry are: no weapon seen, no screaming, no active order, no prior calls, and the woman's express refusal.
The sergeant should announce police presence, state why he is entering, and enter only to check for injured persons and to prevent imminent harm. The scope is a protective sweep and emergency aid, not a full search. Officers may look in places where a person could be hiding or injured, but may not open drawers or search containers. If the thumps and crying are not reasonably explained, entry is defensible; if the woman opens the door and the child appears healthy and says no one else is inside, the exigency may be gone and a warrant is the safer course.
Okafor should document the specific facts known at the moment of entry, the time, the announcement, and the scope. The probationary officer should be used for scene security, not for independent legal decisions.
2. If officers enter and find the boyfriend hiding in a closet with a handgun, what should happen next? Address arrest, the firearm, and any further search.
Read the worked answer
If the man is found hiding in the closet, the immediate priorities are officer safety, securing the handgun, and medical care. The protective sweep justifies looking in the closet, but the handgun can be seized under the plain-view or protective-seizure rationale if its incriminating character is apparent.
The man can be arrested if there is probable cause for domestic battery based on the woman's injury and the circumstances; the sergeant should use a warrant for any broader search of the apartment, phone, or digital devices. The woman's earlier refusal to consent does not disappear because the man is arrested, and consent obtained after entry may be questionable. The sergeant should not let officers search the phone or bedroom without a warrant or valid exception. The firearm should be unloaded, photographed, and inventoried. The child should be checked and, if appropriate, a DCFS report considered.
The report should distinguish the protective sweep from the arrest and from any consent search. Reasoning: a lawful entry does not authorize a general search, and domestic violence cases often turn on victim safety and evidence preservation.
3. The probationary officer asks, 'Can I just check the bedroom for evidence now that he is arrested?' How should the sergeant answer, and what should he document?
Read the worked answer
The probationary officer's request should be denied absent a warrant, consent, or a recognized exception. The earlier entry was for emergency aid and protective sweep; it did not create authority to search for evidence of domestic battery.
The sergeant can ask the woman for consent, but he must first ensure she is medically stable and not pressured, and he must explain that she can refuse. Given the earlier refusal and the emotional scene, a warrant is the cleaner course. The officer should be taught the difference between a protective sweep and an evidentiary search.
If the officer already searched, the sergeant must stop the search, secure the scene, document what was found and by whom, and notify the watch commander. The report should not obscure the sequence. This is a teaching moment, but it is also a potential suppression issue, so the sergeant should not rely on the probationary officer's judgment.