Producer Resignation and Book Ownership
Harborline Insurance Group is a $6.5 million revenue commercial agency with 34 employees. Daniel, a producer with 24 years at the firm, resigned on Friday. He controls $1.4 million of commission revenue-22% of the agency-and his employment agreement, signed in 2009, says only that 'the book belongs to the agency.' It has no non-solicitation clause, no commission tail, and no client-ownership schedule. Daniel told two account managers that 'clients will follow me.' His assistant of 12 years is staying but is close to him. Two accounts represent 18% of his book. Most carrier appointments are in the agency's name, but several clients have named Daniel as agent of record. The agency has no written transition plan and the owner wants to 'enforce the contract' immediately.
1. What is the agency's strongest legal and practical position on Daniel's book, and what should the owner avoid doing in the first 48 hours?
Read the worked answer
The clause is useful evidence that renewal expirations are agency assets, but it is not a non-solicitation covenant. Ownership of expirations does not by itself stop Daniel from calling clients, and agent-of-record designations are client-directed. The owner should not send a threatening letter to clients, lock Daniel out without preserving files, or tell staff to disparage him. Those moves create errors-and-omissions and interference exposure and accelerate departures.
The first 48 hours should be evidence preservation and service continuity: copy emails, CRM notes, policy files, and commission records; confirm which accounts list Daniel as agent of record; notify the E&O carrier and agency counsel; identify a two-person service team for each top account; and meet Daniel to discuss an orderly transition. The practical leverage is service, not ownership rhetoric. The agency should also check state law and the agreement's confidentiality and duty-of-loyalty provisions. The goal is to keep revenue and clients, not to win an ownership argument that may not be enforceable as written.
2. Design a 30-day client retention plan. Which accounts do you prioritize, who contacts them, and what is the message?
Read the worked answer
Prioritize in three tiers. Tier one is the two accounts representing 18% of the book. Tier two is the next 18 accounts where Daniel is agent of record or has the only personal relationship. Tier three is the remainder. The owner and the assigned CSR should make joint calls; the assistant can open doors but should not be the sole contact.
The message should be factual and short: Daniel has left; the agency is responsible for the policies; the service team is unchanged for now; certificates and claims will be handled by named people; and the agency will confirm the agent of record in writing. Do not disparage Daniel and do not promise fee reductions to everyone. Offer an account review to the top 20. Document every call, AOR change, and client concern. Report retention weekly. If a client asks whether Daniel is available, say the agency cannot comment on his plans and focus on continuity.
3. Daniel offers a 90-day transition for a payment equal to 1.5 times his annual commission on retained accounts. How should the owner evaluate that?
Read the worked answer
Estimate Daniel's annual commission first. If $1.4 million is agency commission revenue and his split is 35%, his commission is about $490,000; 1.5 times that is about $735,000. That is a large payment for 90 days, and it pays him for accounts the agency would likely retain anyway. Compare it to the margin at risk: $1.4 million of revenue at roughly 25% margin is about $350,000 of annual EBITDA.
A better structure pays only against retained, collected revenue: for example, 15% to 20% of commission for 12 to 24 months, with clawback if an account leaves. Require a non-solicit, no-hire, confidentiality, a release, and cooperation with introductions. Pay monthly, not upfront. If Daniel refuses, a shorter consulting agreement limited to introductions may be better than a large transition payment. The owner should not let urgency set the price.