CIC Agency Management study materials
CIC Agency Management study resources

Founder Buyout and Perpetuation Structure

CIC Agency Management · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Founder Buyout and Perpetuation Structure

Cedar & Finch is a $5.8 million revenue agency with EBITDA of $1.1 million. Margaret, the 66-year-old founder, owns 62%; two partners, ages 41 and 38, own 19% each. Margaret wants $4.2 million for her shares-about 7.6 times EBITDA-and will retire in 12 months. The partners can raise a 25% down payment, and a bank has offered a seven-year loan at 6.5%. Margaret has relationships with 78% of the top 40 clients. There is no written buy-sell, no key-person retention plan, and no defined governance after closing. The partners fear the bank will require personal guarantees. Margaret says she will 'stay involved' but will not sign a non-compete longer than 12 months.

1. Is the $4.2 million price affordable and supportable? Show the math and the risks.

Read the worked answer

At 25% down, the partners borrow $3.15 million. A seven-year loan at 6.5% costs about $573,000 per year. EBITDA is $1.1 million, but that is before a market-rate salary for Margaret's replacement and before capital expenditures and taxes. If a replacement CEO costs $300,000, pro forma EBITDA is about $800,000, leaving roughly $227,000 of debt-service cushion-thin for an agency with 78% of top-client relationships tied to the seller. The 7.6 times multiple is above what many agencies with concentration and no buy-sell support.

The price is not automatically unaffordable, but it is supportable only with seller financing or an earn-out and a retention plan. Personal guarantees would put the partners' personal assets at risk. Before signing, they should run a downside case: lose 20% of Margaret's top accounts and see whether the loan still performs.

2. Propose a deal structure and post-closing governance that protects the buyers.

Read the worked answer

Structure: $2.8 million cash at closing, a $1.0 million seller note over five years, and a $400,000 earn-out tied to retention of Margaret's top 25 accounts over 24 months. Margaret signs a 36-month non-compete and a 24-month consulting agreement with defined hours, client introductions, and a non-solicit. The buyers get a buy-sell agreement, a board with three seats (two partners and one independent), reserved matters, and a line of credit. The seller note should be subordinated to the bank and include a standstill. Use a retention pool for key CSRs. The earn-out should be based on collected commission, not revenue, and should exclude accounts lost for service reasons.

Governance must specify who can hire, set compensation, and approve carrier appointments. The goal is to transfer relationships, not just shares.

3. What client-retention actions should begin before closing?

Read the worked answer

Map the top 40 clients by revenue and relationship strength. Identify which have a relationship with Margaret only, which with a partner, and which with a CSR. For Margaret-only accounts, schedule joint calls before closing; Margaret introduces the partner as the ongoing relationship lead. Do not wait until the announcement. Prepare a client communication that is factual: ownership is transitioning, the service team remains, there is no coverage interruption, and the partner's contact details are provided. Address key-person risk with carriers and get written confirmation of appointments. Consider retention agreements for the top two producers and the CSR who handles Margaret's largest accounts. Track client-contact completion and agent-of-record changes weekly. Retention is more likely if clients see continuity of the team they know.