First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.
Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.
Question 1Insurance claims handling process
Under a typical UK motor policy, which party bears the burden of proving that a loss falls within the insuring clause before the insurer needs to consider any exclusion?
- The policyholder, because the insured must show the loss is covered by an insured peril Correct answer.
- The loss adjuster, because the adjuster is appointed to determine the cause of loss
- The broker, because the intermediary arranged the cover on the policyholder's behalf
- The insurer, because exclusions are construed against the party relying on them
Explanation
The fundamental principle is that the insured must establish that the loss falls within the scope of the insuring agreement. Only once that burden is discharged does the insurer have to bring the loss within an exclusion or condition. This allocation reflects the general rule that a party asserting a claim proves the facts supporting it.
Question 2Insurance claims handling process
A householder discovers a burst pipe on returning from a two-week holiday and telephones her insurer the same afternoon. Which claim-handling principle does this prompt notification best satisfy?
- The duty to mitigate further damage after a loss
- The requirement to notify the insurer promptly as a condition of the policy Correct answer.
- The requirement to provide a proof of loss within a fixed statutory period
- The principle of subrogation against the responsible contractor
Explanation
Most property policies contain a claims condition requiring the insured to notify the insurer as soon as reasonably practicable, and late notification can prejudice the insurer's investigation. Telephoning on discovery demonstrates compliance with that notification condition. Mitigation concerns steps taken to limit the extent of damage, which is a separate obligation.
Question 3Insurance claims handling process
In the claims process, what is the primary purpose of the insurer's first notification of loss (FNOL) stage?
- To establish whether the policyholder was negligent in causing the incident
- To settle the claim immediately so that the policyholder receives rapid payment
- To record the essential details of the incident and start the claim file and any early action Correct answer.
- To transfer liability to any third party who may have contributed to the loss
Explanation
The FNOL stage captures the basic circumstances, policy details and contact information needed to open a claim record. It also allows the insurer to identify urgent actions such as arranging emergency repairs or appointing an adjuster. Settlement, negligence findings and liability transfers are later, separate stages.
Question 4Insurance claims handling process
An insurer appoints a loss adjuster to investigate a large commercial fire claim. Which function does the adjuster typically perform in this role?
- Selling additional cover to the policyholder to fund the reinstatement
- Acting as the policyholder's advocate in negotiations with the insurer
- Investigating the cause and quantum of the loss and reporting recommendations to the insurer Correct answer.
- Underwriting the renewal terms for the damaged premises
Explanation
A loss adjuster is engaged by the insurer to establish the circumstances, verify the amount of loss and advise on policy liability. The adjuster reports findings and recommendations to the instructing insurer. The adjuster does not underwrite, sell cover or act for the insured.
Question 5Insurance claims handling process
Which of the following best describes the principle of indemnity as applied when settling a property damage claim?
- The insured should recover an amount that includes an element of profit on the damaged goods
- The insured should recover the full policy limit whenever any covered loss occurs
- The insured should be placed in the same financial position as before the loss, subject to the sum insured Correct answer.
- The insured should receive a new replacement item regardless of the age of the damaged property
Explanation
Indemnity aims to restore the insured financially to the position held immediately before the loss, no better and no worse. Settlement is therefore usually based on the value of the damaged property at the time of loss, capped by the sum insured. It does not provide new-for-old or profit unless a specific policy extension applies.
Question 6Insurance claims handling process
A motor insurer pays its policyholder for damage caused by another driver's negligence. What is the insurer's subrogation right in these circumstances?
- To increase the policyholder's premium at the next renewal
- To refuse to indemnify the policyholder until the third party pays
- To recover the sums paid from the negligent third party or that party's insurer Correct answer.
- To cancel the policyholder's cover without notice
Explanation
Subrogation allows an insurer that has indemnified its insured to step into the insured's shoes and pursue the party legally responsible for the loss. In motor claims this commonly means recovery from the negligent driver or their insurer. It operates after payment and is not a tool for avoiding or repricing cover.
Question 7Insurance claims handling process
What is the main purpose of the insurer maintaining a claims reserve on its books?
- To provide an estimate of the liability for claims already reported but not yet settled Correct answer.
- To cover the cost of marketing the insurer's products
- To guarantee that the policyholder receives a minimum settlement amount
- To fund the salaries of the claims handling team
Explanation
A claims reserve is an estimate of the insurer's outstanding liability for reported claims, including expected settlement costs and expenses. Reserves support solvency reporting and financial planning. They are not a guarantee to the policyholder or a budget for operating expenditure.
Question 8Insurance claims handling process
Which term describes the situation where an insured deliberately overstates the value of lost property in order to obtain a larger payment?
- Innocent misrepresentation
- Exaggeration of a genuine claim amounting to fraud Correct answer.
- Salvage
- Betterment
Explanation
Deliberately inflating the value of a claim to obtain more than is due is a fraudulent act. Insurers may treat the whole claim as invalid and may also cancel the policy and report the matter. It is distinguished from an honest error in the figures.
Question 9Insurance claims handling process
During a claim for storm damage to a roof, the insurer discovers that the policyholder failed to disclose a prior subsidence claim at inception. How should the claims handler treat this information?
- Refer it for assessment of whether the non-disclosure affects the validity or terms of the policy Correct answer.
- Automatically decline the claim without any further review
- Pass it to the loss adjuster to decide whether cover should be voided
- Ignore it, because the current claim is unrelated to subsidence
Explanation
Material non-disclosure discovered during a claim must be assessed against the policy's terms and the applicable disclosure rules. The handler should refer the matter so that the effect on cover and any proportionate remedy can be determined. It cannot simply be ignored, and automatic declinature without review would be improper.
Question 10Insurance claims handling process
An insured's business interruption claim requires the calculation of gross profit lost following a fire. Which figure should the claims handler use as the basis for the loss of gross profit?
- Turnover for the corresponding period in the preceding year
- Total turnover less all fixed costs regardless of whether they continue
- Net profit plus insured standing charges, adjusted for the trend of the business Correct answer.
- The sum insured declared on the policy schedule
Explanation
Gross profit for business interruption purposes is conventionally net trading profit plus insured standing charges, with allowance for the trend and circumstances affecting the business. The calculation seeks to reflect the profit that would have been earned but for the incident. Turnover alone or the sum insured is not the measure of the loss.
Question 11Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder reports a theft but cannot produce receipts for the stolen items. What is the most appropriate approach for the claims handler to take?
- Refer the matter to the police and take no further action until a prosecution results
- Accept the claim at the full amount claimed without further enquiry
- Reject the claim outright because receipts are a strict condition precedent
- Seek alternative evidence of ownership and value, such as bank statements or photographs, before agreeing quantum Correct answer.
Explanation
Insurers require evidence to substantiate ownership and value, but lack of receipts does not automatically defeat a genuine claim. The handler should gather reasonable alternative evidence and assess quantum on the balance of probabilities. Outright rejection or uncritical acceptance would both be improper.
Question 12Insurance claims handling process
A liability claim is received alleging that the insured's employee injured a visitor. Why must the claims handler check the policy's retroactive date?
- To establish the renewal date of the policy
- To confirm the premium has been paid for the current period
- To determine whether the incident occurred on or after the date from which cover applies Correct answer.
- To identify the deductible that applies to property damage
Explanation
A retroactive date in a liability policy sets the earliest date from which incidents are covered, regardless of when the claim is made. Incidents before that date fall outside the cover. The handler must therefore compare the date of the incident with the retroactive date.
Question 13Insurance claims handling process
An insurer suspects that a fire was started deliberately by the policyholder. Which action is most consistent with good claims handling practice?
- Ask the loss adjuster to decide whether the policyholder should be prosecuted
- Suspend settlement, preserve evidence and appoint a specialist fire investigator Correct answer.
- Cancel the policy immediately and inform the policyholder by telephone
- Pay the claim promptly to avoid a complaint and investigate afterwards
Explanation
Where fraud is suspected, the insurer should not settle until the cause has been properly investigated. Preserving evidence and instructing a specialist fire investigator protects the insurer's position and supports any later recovery or defence. Decisions on prosecution rest with the authorities, not the adjuster.
Question 14Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder's building suffers water damage and the insurer arranges emergency drying and repairs. Which obligation is the insured primarily discharging by allowing these steps?
- The duty to mitigate the loss and prevent further damage Correct answer.
- The duty to subrogate the claim to the insurer
- The duty to pay the excess before any repairs begin
- The duty to disclose all material facts at renewal
Explanation
Insureds are expected to take reasonable steps to prevent the loss from worsening, and cooperating with emergency drying and repairs serves that mitigation duty. The insurer often arranges these works to limit the ultimate claim cost. Disclosure, excess payment and subrogation are distinct obligations.
Question 15Insurance claims handling process
In a claim involving damage to stock, the loss adjuster identifies items that retain a resale value. What is the correct treatment of this salvage?
- It is retained by the policyholder free of any deduction from the claim
- It is added to the settlement as compensation for inconvenience
- It is disregarded because only total losses generate salvage
- Its value is deducted from the loss or it is sold for the insurer's account to reduce the net claim Correct answer.
Explanation
Salvage represents the residual value of damaged property, and indemnity requires that this value be brought into account. The insurer may deduct the salvage value from the settlement or dispose of it for its own account. Ignoring salvage would over-indemnify the insured.
Question 16Insurance claims handling process
A commercial policy contains an average (underinsurance) condition. The property is insured for £400,000 but the true reinstatement value at the time of loss is £500,000, and the loss is £100,000. How will the condition typically apply?
- The claim is reduced in the proportion 400,000/500,000, giving £80,000 Correct answer.
- The full £100,000 is paid because the loss is below the sum insured
- The claim is reduced by the £100,000 shortfall, giving nil
- The claim is paid in full but the sum insured is reduced to nil
Explanation
An average condition reduces the claim in the same proportion that the sum insured bears to the value at risk. Here the proportion is 400,000 divided by 500,000, or 0.8, applied to the £100,000 loss to give £80,000. This penalises underinsurance and encourages accurate declarations.
Question 17Insurance claims handling process
A third party writes to the insurer alleging that the insured caused injury and threatening legal action. Why should the insurer be notified immediately even before any proceedings are issued?
- So that the insurer can increase the insured's premium straight away
- So that the third party can be added to the policy as an additional insured
- So that the insurer can investigate, control the defence and preserve its rights under the policy Correct answer.
- So that the insured can avoid paying any excess
Explanation
Liability policies normally require prompt notification of circumstances that may give rise to a claim. Early notification allows the insurer to investigate, appoint solicitors and take control of the defence. It also protects the insurer's position if the third party later sues.
Question 18Insurance claims handling process
What is the role of a loss assessor in the claims process, as distinct from a loss adjuster?
- The assessor decides whether the insurer must pay the claim
- The assessor sets the premium for the following year
- The assessor is appointed by the policyholder to negotiate and present the claim Correct answer.
- The assessor is appointed by the insurer to verify the claim
Explanation
A loss assessor acts for the policyholder, helping to prepare, present and negotiate the claim. This contrasts with the loss adjuster, who is instructed by the insurer to investigate and report. The assessor does not decide policy liability or set premiums.
Question 19Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder's claim is ready for settlement, but a third party has indicated an intention to sue the insured for the same incident. What is the main reason the insurer may delay final settlement?
- To allow the policyholder time to find cheaper repairs
- To comply with a statutory rule that all claims must be settled within 30 days
- To avoid paying the excess that the insured owes
- To wait for the third party's claim so that subrogation rights and overall liability can be assessed together Correct answer.
Explanation
Where a third party may pursue the insured, the insurer needs to consider the overall exposure and preserve subrogation rights before finalising its own payment. Settling prematurely could prejudice recovery or the defence of the third-party claim. The other options describe unrelated or non-existent rules.
Question 20Insurance claims handling process
During the investigation of a burglary claim, the handler notes that the insured's described security arrangements differ from those declared on the proposal. What is the most appropriate next step?
- Decline the claim automatically because any discrepancy voids the policy
- Pay the claim and note the discrepancy for future underwriting
- Ask the police to decide whether the insurer should pay
- Assess whether the difference is material to the risk and whether it affects cover, referring as necessary Correct answer.
Explanation
A discrepancy between the declared and actual risk must be assessed for materiality and its effect on the policy. Not every difference justifies declining a claim, and the decision rests with the insurer after proper review. The police have no role in determining policy liability.
Question 21Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder suffers a total loss of a vehicle that is subject to outstanding finance. How should the insurer normally deal with the settlement?
- Pay only the outstanding finance balance and retain any surplus
- Refuse to pay because the vehicle is not owned outright
- Pay the full settlement to the policyholder without reference to the finance company
- Pay the finance company the outstanding balance and the policyholder any surplus, in line with the policy terms Correct answer.
Explanation
Where a vehicle is financed, the insurer typically settles the outstanding finance directly with the lender and pays any balance to the policyholder. This reflects the respective interests in the vehicle and the policy terms. The insurer cannot simply retain the surplus or ignore the lender.
Question 22Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder reports a claim for accidental damage to a laptop, but the policy excludes damage caused by wear and tear. The laptop was three years old and the screen failed gradually. How should the handler approach the claim?
- Refer the claim to the Financial Ombudsman Service for a decision
- Pay the claim because accidental damage cover applies to all damage
- Investigate the cause to determine whether the failure is accidental damage or excluded wear and tear Correct answer.
- Decline the claim solely because the laptop was three years old
Explanation
The handler must establish the cause of the damage before deciding whether the insuring clause or the exclusion applies. Gradual deterioration suggests wear and tear, but this needs to be verified. Age alone is not a reason to decline, and the Ombudsman is not the first port of call.
Question 23Insurance claims handling process
An insurer receives a claim that appears to fall within an exclusion for damage caused by faulty workmanship. Which principle governs the interpretation of that exclusion?
- Exclusions are construed narrowly, with ambiguity resolved in favour of the insured Correct answer.
- Exclusions are ignored where the insured acted in good faith
- Exclusions are read in the widest possible sense against the insured
- Exclusions apply only where the insurer can prove dishonesty
Explanation
Exclusion clauses are interpreted strictly, and any genuine ambiguity is resolved against the party that drafted the policy, namely the insurer. This is the contra proferentem principle. It does not require dishonesty or ignore clear exclusion wording.
Question 24Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder settles a claim directly with a third party without the insurer's consent, having already been indemnified by the insurer for the same loss. What effect may this have on the insurer's position?
- It may prejudice or extinguish the insurer's subrogation rights against the third party Correct answer.
- It automatically doubles the insurer's liability
- No effect, because the insurer's subrogation rights are unaffected by the insured's actions
- It transfers the policy to the third party
Explanation
Subrogation depends on the insured's rights against the third party, and the insured must not compromise those rights after indemnity. A settlement without the insurer's consent can prejudice or destroy the insurer's recovery. The insurer may then have a remedy against the insured for the loss of those rights.
Question 25Insurance claims handling process
A claim is presented under a policy that contains a condition requiring the insured to submit to examination under oath. The insured refuses without explanation. How should the insurer respond?
- Immediately pay the claim to avoid litigation
- Consider the effect of the breach on the claim, including whether it is a condition precedent to liability Correct answer.
- Refer the matter to the Financial Conduct Authority for enforcement
- Ignore the refusal because such conditions are unenforceable in the UK
Explanation
The insurer must assess the status of the condition in the policy and the consequences of the breach, including whether it is a condition precedent to liability. Refusal to cooperate may entitle the insurer to decline or reduce the claim depending on the wording. Such conditions are not automatically unenforceable, and the FCA does not adjudicate individual claims.
Question 26Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder notifies an insurer of a fire at their warehouse three months after it occurred. Which claims principle is most directly engaged by this delay?
- The principle of indemnity limiting recovery to actual loss
- The duty to give prompt notification and cooperate with the insurer Correct answer.
- The doctrine of subrogation transferring rights against third parties
- The requirement of insurable interest at inception of the policy
Explanation
Policies contain conditions requiring the insured to notify claims promptly and cooperate with the investigation. Late notification can prejudice the insurer's ability to investigate and may entitle the insurer to decline or reduce the claim where prejudice is shown. The other principles concern the measure of recovery or the insurer's rights, not the timing of notice.
Question 27Insurance claims handling process
Which activity best describes the purpose of the triage stage when a new claim is first registered?
- Identifying the policy, validating cover and flagging complexity or fraud indicators Correct answer.
- Reporting the claim to reinsurers as a large loss
- Calculating the final settlement figure for the insured
- Appointing solicitors to defend any third-party proceedings
Explanation
Triage confirms that the policy was in force, the loss falls within the insured perils and any exclusions, and it identifies claims needing specialist handling, adjusters or fraud referral. Settlement calculation and legal defence come later in the process. Reinsurance notification is only relevant for certain large losses.
Question 28Insurance claims handling process
An insurer pays a claim for storm damage to a shop, then discovers the damage arose from a contractor's negligence. What does subrogation allow the insurer to do?
- Claim the loss back from the Financial Ombudsman Service
- Cancel the policy from inception for misrepresentation
- Pursue the contractor in the insured's name to recover the amount paid Correct answer.
- Reopen the policy and increase the insured's premium retrospectively
Explanation
Subrogation lets the insurer step into the insured's legal shoes and pursue a third party who caused the loss, recovering up to the amount paid. It does not affect premium rating, allow retrospective cancellation, or involve the ombudsman. The insured must not prejudice the insurer's recovery rights.
Question 29Insurance claims handling process
What is the primary function of a claims reserve recorded when a claim is first notified?
- To guarantee the insured a minimum settlement amount
- To pay the loss adjuster's fees in advance
- To fund the insurer's marketing budget for the year
- To record the insurer's estimated liability so that financial statements reflect known obligations Correct answer.
Explanation
A reserve is the insurer's best estimate of the cost of a notified claim, set aside so that liabilities are recognised in the accounts as they arise. It is not a promise to the insured, nor a prepayment of fees or a general fund. Reserves are reviewed and adjusted as the claim develops.
Question 30Insurance claims handling process
Which document typically sets out the insured's duties after a loss, such as providing evidence and allowing inspection?
- The certificate of insurance
- The broker's terms of business
- The schedule of insured property
- The policy conditions Correct answer.
Explanation
Policy conditions contain the claims obligations, including notice, proof of loss, cooperation and inspection rights. The schedule lists insured items and sums insured, the certificate evidences cover, and the broker's terms govern the broker-client relationship. Handlers rely on the conditions when assessing compliance.
Question 31Insurance claims handling process
A handler receives a claim where the insured has already had repairs carried out without any prior notification. Which initial step is most appropriate?
- Establish whether the policy required prior consent and whether the insurer has been prejudiced Correct answer.
- Refer the matter immediately to the Financial Ombudsman Service
- Reject the claim automatically because repairs were completed
- Pay the invoice in full to maintain the customer relationship
Explanation
Many policies require the insurer's consent before repairs, but breach of such a condition only gives grounds to decline where the insurer has suffered prejudice. The handler should therefore investigate consent requirements and prejudice before deciding. Automatic rejection or full payment without enquiry would both be premature.
Question 32Insurance claims handling process
What distinguishes a loss adjuster from a loss assessor in the claims process?
- The assessor sets reserves while the adjuster negotiates premiums
- The adjuster normally acts for the insurer while the assessor normally acts for the insured Correct answer.
- Both act solely for the court in litigation
- The adjuster acts for the insured while the assessor acts for the insurer
Explanation
A loss adjuster is typically instructed by the insurer to investigate and quantify the claim, whereas a loss assessor is engaged by the policyholder to prepare and negotiate the claim. Both may be professionally qualified, but their loyalties differ. Neither sets reserves on behalf of the insurer, and premiums are a separate underwriting matter.
Question 33Insurance claims handling process
An insured reports a claim under a policy that had lapsed for non-payment of premium two weeks before the loss. What should the handler do first?
- Refer the claim to the loss adjuster to quantify the damage
- Ask the insured to pay the outstanding premium and then settle
- Verify the lapse and confirm no cover was in force at the date of loss Correct answer.
- Pay the claim as a gesture of goodwill without checking
Explanation
Cover must exist at the date of loss for a claim to be valid, so the handler should first confirm the lapse and whether any reinstatement occurred. Goodwill payment or accepting premium after the loss would be a commercial decision outside normal handling. Instructing an adjuster is pointless until cover is established.
Question 34Insurance claims handling process
During a liability claim, the handler must decide whether to appoint solicitors to defend the insured. Which factor is most relevant to that decision?
- Whether the claimant has previously made claims against other parties
- Whether the policy provides defence costs cover and the allegations disclose a potential liability Correct answer.
- Whether the insured's premium is due for renewal
- Whether the insured has other insurance policies with different insurers
Explanation
The insurer's duty to defend depends on the policy's defence costs provision and whether the allegations, if proved, would fall within the indemnity. Other policies may raise contribution questions but do not determine the defence decision. The claimant's history and the renewal date are not direct triggers for appointing solicitors.
Question 35Insurance claims handling process
An insured's stock is destroyed by fire and the policy is subject to average. The sum insured is £60,000, the value at risk at the date of loss is £80,000, and the loss is £40,000. Applying the average condition, what amount is payable before any deductible?
- £60,000
- £30,000 Correct answer.
- £20,000
- £40,000
Explanation
Under average, the payout is the loss multiplied by the ratio of sum insured to value at risk: £40,000 × (£60,000 ÷ £80,000) = £30,000. This reflects the underinsurance proportion. Paying the full loss or the sum insured would ignore the condition, and £20,000 does not follow from the formula.
Question 36Insurance claims handling process
A handler suspects a fire was deliberately set by the insured. Which course of action best reflects proper claims practice?
- Continue investigating covertly while preserving evidence and not disclosing suspicions prematurely Correct answer.
- Cancel the policy and refuse all future cover without further enquiry
- Immediately inform the insured of the suspicion and ask for a written denial
- Pay the claim and refer the matter to the police afterwards
Explanation
Where fraud is suspected, the insurer should investigate thoroughly, preserve evidence and avoid alerting the insured in ways that could allow evidence to be destroyed. A formal fraud investigation and, where appropriate, police involvement follow. Paying first or cancelling without evidence would be premature and could prejudice recovery.
Question 37Insurance claims handling process
A third party has threatened to sue the insured over an accident. Why should the insurer be notified promptly even before proceedings are issued?
- To transfer liability for the accident to the third party's insurer
- To allow the insurer to investigate, control the defence and preserve its subrogation and settlement options Correct answer.
- To trigger an automatic increase in the insured's premium
- To enable the insured to claim legal costs from the third party
Explanation
Early notification lets the insurer investigate the facts, take control of the defence and consider settlement while evidence is fresh. It also protects the insurer's rights, including any recovery from others. It does not shift liability to another insurer or automatically change the premium.
Question 38Insurance claims handling process
An insured cannot provide receipts for stolen jewellery but has photographs and a jeweller's valuation from two years earlier. What is the most appropriate handling approach?
- Reject the claim because receipts are missing
- Consider the alternative evidence and assess whether it reasonably proves ownership and value Correct answer.
- Pay the full sum insured without further enquiry
- Refer the insured to the police as the only remedy
Explanation
Insurers may accept alternative evidence that reasonably establishes ownership and value, such as photographs, valuations and bank records. Missing receipts alone do not justify rejection. Paying the full sum insured without verification risks overpayment, and police referral does not resolve the insurance claim.
Question 39Insurance claims handling process
A claim is made for business interruption following a fire. Which measure should the handler use to assess the loss where the policy insures gross profit?
- The total turnover for the preceding financial year
- The reduction in turnover multiplied by the gross profit rate, less any savings in insured standing charges Correct answer.
- The insured's net profit before tax for the year
- The replacement cost of the damaged building
Explanation
Gross profit cover is designed to restore the insured's earnings, so the loss is the shortfall in turnover applied to the gross profit rate, adjusted for savings in insured standing charges. Historic turnover, building replacement cost and net profit figures do not by themselves measure the interruption loss.
Question 40Insurance claims handling process
What is the main purpose of a claims management system recording a full audit trail of decisions and payments?
- To replace the need for a loss adjuster on all claims
- To determine the premium for the next renewal
- To provide evidence of regulatory compliance and support later review or dispute resolution Correct answer.
- To calculate the insured's no-claims discount automatically
Explanation
An audit trail evidences that the claim was handled properly, supports internal review and defends the insurer if a complaint or dispute arises. It does not set premiums or no-claims discounts and cannot replace the specialist investigation that an adjuster provides. Records also help detect fraud patterns.
Question 41Insurance claims handling process
An insured settles directly with an injured third party without the insurer's consent after the insurer has accepted indemnity. What is the likely consequence?
- The insurer must pay the settlement in full regardless of consent
- The insurer can recover the settlement from the third party automatically
- The insurer may be entitled to refuse or reduce the claim to the extent it has been prejudiced Correct answer.
- The insured is automatically prosecuted for fraud
Explanation
Policies typically prohibit the insured from admitting liability or settling without the insurer's consent, because this undermines the insurer's control of the defence. Breach may allow the insurer to decline or reduce the claim where prejudice is shown. Automatic full payment, recovery from the third party or prosecution do not follow automatically.
Question 42Insurance claims handling process
A property claim includes items that the loss adjuster believes retain a resale value after damage. How should the settlement be calculated?
- Ignore the salvage value because it belongs to the insured
- Add the salvage value to the claim as a separate head of loss
- Deduct the salvage value from the loss before applying any average or deductible Correct answer.
- Pay the full replacement cost and allow the insured to keep the salvage proceeds
Explanation
Indemnity requires the insured to be placed in the same financial position as before the loss, so any residual value in damaged property reduces the loss. Salvage value is therefore deducted before applying average or a deductible. Paying full cost while the insured keeps salvage would over-indemnify, and adding salvage to the claim is illogical.
Question 43Insurance claims handling process
An insurer receives a claim under a policy where the insured failed to disclose a prior subsidence claim at proposal. What is the correct first step in claims handling?
- Pay the claim and then cancel the policy
- Assess whether the non-disclosure was material and what the insurer would have done had it known Correct answer.
- Refer the matter to the police as suspected fraud
- Decline the claim immediately because any non-disclosure voids cover
Explanation
The handler must establish whether the undisclosed information was material and, if so, what the insurer would have done had it been disclosed, as this determines the remedy. Not every non-disclosure voids the policy. Paying without enquiry or involving the police before assessing materiality would be premature.
Question 44Insurance claims handling process
Which statement best explains why the insurer may require the insured to attend an interview under caution during a suspicious claim?
- To give the insured legal advice about their policy
- To satisfy the insurer's obligation to pay within a fixed period
- To set the amount of the claim reserve
- To obtain a formal record of the insured's account that can be tested against other evidence Correct answer.
Explanation
A recorded interview allows the insurer to obtain the insured's account in a form that can be compared with documents and other evidence, which is valuable in suspected fraud. It is not a means of giving legal advice, setting reserves or meeting a payment deadline. The insured may wish to be accompanied or advised.
Question 45Insurance claims handling process
A policyholder's building is damaged by water and the insurer arranges emergency drying. Which obligation does this action primarily support?
- The duty to pay the claim within a set period
- The duty to maintain accurate premium records
- The duty to disclose all material facts at renewal
- The duty to mitigate the loss and prevent further damage Correct answer.
Explanation
Taking steps to prevent further damage, such as emergency drying, supports the insured's duty to mitigate and the insurer's interest in limiting the loss. Disclosure and premium records relate to underwriting, and payment timing is a separate regulatory and contractual matter.
Question 46Insurance claims handling process
A claim is presented under a policy that requires the insured to submit to examination under oath. The insured refuses without explanation. How should the handler proceed?
- Ignore the refusal and pay the claim in full
- Consider whether the refusal breaches a condition and whether the insurer has been prejudiced before deciding on the claim Correct answer.
- Automatically treat the refusal as fraud and report it to the police
- Cancel the policy from inception and recover all past claims
Explanation
Refusal to comply with an examination under oath condition may entitle the insurer to decline where it has been prejudiced, but the handler should assess the breach and its effect first. Ignoring the refusal forfeits the insurer's position, while treating it as fraud or cancelling from inception goes beyond what the evidence supports.
Question 47Insurance claims handling process
An insurer identifies a pattern of similar small claims from the same address across several policies. Which response is most consistent with good claims governance?
- Refer the pattern to a specialist fraud team for analysis while continuing to handle individual claims fairly Correct answer.
- Decline all claims from the address without further investigation
- Pay all claims quickly to avoid complaints
- Cancel every policy at the address immediately
Explanation
Patterns across claims and policies are a recognised fraud indicator that warrants specialist analysis, but each claim must still be handled fairly and on its own evidence. Blanket refusal, rapid payment or immediate cancellation without investigation would be unfair and could expose the insurer to complaints.
Question 48Insurance claims handling process
A large liability claim is received that may exceed the insurer's retention under a facultative reinsurance arrangement. What is the appropriate claims handling action?
- Ask the insured to claim directly from the reinsurer
- Handle the claim without reference to the reinsurance programme
- Notify the reinsurer promptly in line with the reinsurance terms and keep it informed of developments Correct answer.
- Wait until the claim is settled before informing the reinsurer
Explanation
Reinsurance agreements typically require prompt notification of claims that may breach the retention, and the reinsurer may wish to be involved in the defence or settlement. Late notification can prejudice reinsurance recovery. The insured has no direct contractual relationship with the reinsurer, so directing them there is wrong.
Question 49Insurance claims handling process
A claim is made under a policy where the insured's loss occurred before inception but was reported after inception. Which principle determines whether the claim is covered?
- The insured's renewal date determines cover
- The date of notification always determines cover
- The occurrence must fall within the policy period, subject to any claims-made wording Correct answer.
- The date of settlement determines cover
Explanation
Under occurrence-based policies, cover depends on when the loss occurred, not when it was reported. Claims-made policies instead respond to claims made or notified during the period, so the wording must be checked. Notification, settlement and renewal dates are not the general tests for occurrence cover.
Question 50Insurance claims handling process
An insurer discovers that an insured misrepresented the value of lost stock in a claim that is otherwise valid. What is the most appropriate response under a typical fraud condition?
- Treat the whole claim as forfeited if the misrepresentation was deliberate and material, after proper investigation Correct answer.
- Reduce the claim by the value of the misrepresentation only
- Refer the insured to arbitration before any decision
- Pay the full claim because part of it was genuine
Explanation
Typical fraud conditions provide that a deliberately false or exaggerated claim forfeits the entire claim, including genuine elements. The handler must first establish that the misrepresentation was deliberate and material. Paying in full or merely reducing the claim would not reflect the condition, and arbitration is not a precondition to the insurer's decision.