Dog Bite, Prior Propensity, and Late Notice
Greg owns a 2015 HO-3 with Coverage E $300,000 and Coverage F $5,000. His 6-year-old rescue dog, Otis, bit a neighbor in 2022; Greg told his agent about that bite but the carrier's file contains no record of it. In April, Otis slipped through a gate and bit a mail carrier twice on the forearm, requiring 14 stitches and $11,000 in medical bills. The Postal Service sends a demand letter. Greg forwards it to his agent three weeks later, and the carrier receives it 45 days after the bite. The carrier retains defense counsel under a reservation of rights and files a declaratory judgment action citing the 'expected or intended' exclusion and Greg's failure to give prompt notice. Greg says the bite was an accident, that he was on a business trip when the letter arrived, and that he could not find the policy because his home office was being painted. The mail carrier has not sued yet.
1. Does Coverage E obligate the carrier to defend and indemnify Greg for the mail carrier's injury? Analyze the occurrence, the expected-or-intended exclusion, and the prior bite.
Read the worked answer
Coverage E applies to bodily injury caused by an occurrence, which means an accident. A dog bite can be an occurrence. The carrier's 'expected or intended' exclusion is the real issue: if Greg knew Otis had bitten a neighbor in 2022 and did nothing to restrain the dog, a jury could find that some injury was expected, even if the exact bite was not intended. That is a fact question, not a certainty. The duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify: because the demand letter alleges negligence and does not allege that Greg intended the bite, the carrier must defend under a reservation of rights and can seek a declaratory judgment. If the court finds the injury was expected, indemnity is barred, but defense costs are still owed until the coverage issue is resolved. The agent's knowledge of the prior bite may be imputed to the carrier, which weakens a claim that the policy was obtained by misrepresentation, but it does not erase the exclusion.
2. Does Coverage F pay any of the $11,000 medical bills? Explain the interaction of no-fault medical payments, the intentional-injury exclusion, and the workers' compensation exclusion.
Read the worked answer
Coverage F pays reasonable medical expenses incurred within three years, without regard to fault, up to $5,000. It is not a liability coverage and does not require a lawsuit. Two exclusions matter. First, Coverage F does not pay for injury expected or intended by an insured; if the same facts that support the Coverage E exclusion are found, F is also barred. Second, Coverage F excludes medical expenses for persons eligible for workers' compensation. A mail carrier injured on duty is a federal employee and is eligible for benefits under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, so the carrier will likely deny F on that ground. Even if F applied, the $11,000 bill exceeds the $5,000 limit. If the workers' compensation exclusion did not apply, F would pay up to $5,000 regardless of negligence, which is why it is often called 'goodwill' coverage.
3. What is the effect of the 45-day delay in notice, and what should Greg do now?
Read the worked answer
The HO-3 requires prompt notice of an occurrence and immediate forwarding of legal papers. A 45-day delay is not automatically fatal; in most states the carrier must show substantial prejudice from the delay. Here the carrier retained counsel and filed a declaratory judgment action, so it is already defending under a reservation of rights; that reduces, but does not eliminate, a prejudice argument. Greg should immediately provide a recorded statement, the policy, Otis's veterinary and bite history, the agent's file, and all correspondence; he should not talk to the claimant or the Postal Service without counsel. Failure to cooperate is a separate condition that can defeat coverage even if notice was adequate. The agent should document the 2022 disclosure because it affects both the misrepresentation analysis and the expected-injury analysis.