Cameroon Heavy-Vehicle Theory study materials
Cameroon Heavy-Vehicle Theory study resources

Air-brake warning at the Douala depot

Cameroon Heavy-Vehicle Theory · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Air-brake warning at the Douala depot

It is 04:45 in a Douala transport yard and a driver is doing the pre-trip inspection on a 2014 Mercedes Actros 2640 tractor coupled to a loaded flatbed of 30 t of bagged cement. The vehicle is due to leave at 05:00 for Bamenda. The driver records: the compressor builds from 0 to 6 bar in 4 minutes; the governor cuts out at 7.2 bar; the low-pressure warning buzzer sounds at 5.5 bar; there is a continuous hiss at the left rear brake chamber; the wet-tank drain releases milky grey liquid; the ABS warning lamp stays on after the self-test; and the left drive-axle slack adjuster pushrod shows 55 mm of travel against a workshop limit of 45 mm. The yard is on level ground. The dispatcher wants the truck on the road before the Bamenda rain starts and says the gauge is 'always a bit lazy'.

1. Rank the findings from most to least safety-critical and say which one alone would justify refusing to leave the yard.

Read the worked answer

Ranking by immediate risk of losing braking:

  1. Continuous hiss at the left rear chamber. This is an active leak in the service brake circuit. It will drain pressure faster each time the brake is applied and can leave that wheel, or the circuit feeding it, with little or no braking force. This alone justifies refusal.
  2. Pushrod travel of 55 mm against a 45 mm limit. The chamber is near the end of its stroke. Braking force falls and air consumption rises; on a long descent the slack adjuster can run out of travel entirely. This alone also justifies refusal.
  3. Milky grey liquid from the wet tank. Water and possibly oil are passing the compressor or air dryer. Moisture corrodes valves and can freeze or gel, causing uneven or delayed braking.
  4. Slow build and low governor cut-out (7.2 bar). The system is not reaching normal governed pressure, so reserve capacity is reduced and the compressor is working near its limit.
  5. ABS lamp staying on. ABS is disabled. The service brakes may still work, but wheel lock-up on the wet Bamenda road becomes more likely.

The decisive combination is the active leak plus the over-limit pushrod. Either one, on a 30 t load bound for a long climb and descent, is enough to keep the truck in the yard.

2. Describe the static leak test and compressor build-up check you would perform, including what you would observe and the pass/fail criteria you would apply before signing the vehicle out.

Read the worked answer

Chock the wheels and secure the vehicle on level ground. Build the system to governor cut-out, switch off the engine, and note the cut-out pressure; the workshop figure for this tractor is in the 8.3–9.0 bar range, so 7.2 bar is already a fail. With the engine off, release the parking brake and apply the service brake fully, holding it for three minutes. Watch the gauge and listen at each chamber, valve and line, using soapy water where access allows. The company criterion is no more than about 0.5 bar per minute drop with the brake applied, and no more than about 0.2 bar per minute with the brakes released. Any continuous audible leak at a chamber is a fail regardless of the gauge reading.

For build-up, run the engine at fast idle from a drained system and time 0 to 8 bar; the checklist expects this within about three minutes. Note the governor cut-out and the pressure at which the low-pressure warning sounds. Then check that the warning and the spring brakes apply correctly when pressure is deliberately drained.

Finally, measure and record pushrod travel on every chamber against the workshop limit, and confirm the ABS lamp extinguishes after the self-test. A pass requires no audible leak, pressure within the governed range, acceptable drop rates, travel within limit and a functioning ABS. These findings fail on at least three counts, so the vehicle goes to the workshop.

3. The dispatcher insists the gauge is lazy. How should the driver respond, and what are the operational and legal consequences of driving with these defects?

Read the worked answer

The driver should respond in writing, not by argument alone. Record each defect on the inspection sheet with the measurement - 7.2 bar cut-out, 55 mm pushrod, audible leak at the left rear chamber, contaminated wet tank, ABS lamp on - sign it, and give a copy to the dispatcher or transport manager. The driver should state clearly that the vehicle is not roadworthy and request either workshop repair or a replacement tractor. If the dispatcher still insists, the driver should escalate to the transport manager and, if necessary, refuse the trip. A driver who signs out a defective vehicle carries personal exposure.

Operationally, the risks are concrete. A 30 t load on the climb out of Douala and the descents toward Bamenda demands full brake reserve. A leaking chamber and a long-stroke pushrod can produce unequal braking, a pull to one side and a runaway on a gradient. The contaminated wet tank can cause valve sticking in cool rain. ABS being disabled increases lock-up and jack-knife risk.

Legally, the vehicle is unroadworthy, insurance can be affected after a crash, and the driver and operator can face penalties at a gendarmerie or police control. The company's operating licence and reputation are also at stake. The correct decision is to keep the truck in the yard until the repairs are made and the tests are repeated.