Three Days at the Police Post
At a police post in a market town, a trader is arrested after a quarrel over a parking space. The officer says the trader insulted a public officer. The trader is held for 72 hours, is not allowed to call his family, and is released only after paying 15,000 FCFA for the file. No charge sheet is given, and no receipt is issued. His 14-year-old son, who came to bring food, is held for four hours and then sent away. The nearest magistrate's court is 70 km away, and the family does not know a lawyer. The trader has a swelling on his wrist and says he was handcuffed too tightly. The police post has no custody register on display and no female officer present. The trader wants justice but fears that complaining will lead to further harassment.
1. Identify the rights that were violated and explain the legal standards that apply, including any limits on police custody.
Read the worked answer
Several rights are engaged. Liberty and security: the trader was held for 72 hours. Under Cameroonian criminal procedure, police custody is ordinarily limited to 48 hours, and any extension must be authorised by the competent judicial authority; 72 hours without such authorisation is unlawful. The right to be informed of the charge and to communicate with family and counsel was breached. The demand for 15,000 FCFA for the file looks like extortion or a bribe, not a lawful fee, especially since no receipt was issued. The detention of the 14-year-old, even for four hours, raises the rights of the child, including that detention be a last resort and that a child be held separately. Tight handcuffing may amount to inhuman or degrading treatment if it was unnecessary and caused injury. The absence of a custody register undermines the right to have detention reviewed. The presumption of innocence is also relevant: insulting a public officer must be proved, not assumed, and it does not justify extortion.
2. What practical steps can the trader take, and which institutions can help?
Read the worked answer
He should first obtain medical evidence: a dated certificate describing the wrist injury. He should write down the officers' names, the time, and any witnesses. He should not pay again. He can complain to the public prosecutor and to the National Commission on Human Rights and Freedoms, which can investigate and visit places of detention. He can ask a lawyer or a legal-aid organisation to request the custody record and file a complaint. The administrative superior of the police post should also receive a written complaint.
If he fears retaliation, he can complain through a lawyer or an NGO and ask that his identity be protected as far as the law allows. A civil claim for the 15,000 FCFA is possible, but the priority is a criminal complaint and an official record. Keeping copies of everything is essential.
3. Why is this case about more than one officer's behaviour? Discuss what citizens and authorities can do to strengthen public accountability.
Read the worked answer
This is not just one officer's fault. A custody register that is not displayed, a remote court, and a public that expects to pay for the file are systemic problems. Citizens can ask for receipts, record dates and names, and support legal-literacy sessions. Community groups can monitor the police post, publish a simple know-your-rights leaflet, and build a relationship with the prosecutor and the human rights commission. Authorities should enforce the custody register, rotate officers, display complaint numbers, and investigate extortion promptly.
The deeper principle is public accountability: power must be exercised openly and be reviewable. If the trader complains alone, he may be seen as a troublemaker; if 20 traders document payments and one NGO presents a pattern, the issue becomes a public-accountability problem that institutions must answer.