Ghost Town, 1991: A Shopkeeper's Ledger
It is June 1991 in Bamenda. Opposition groups have called for 'Operation Ghost Town': a week of stay-at-home protests and closed shops to force the government to hold a national conference. You run a small hardware store with 4 employees. You have 1.2 million CFA francs in stock, a bank loan due in six weeks, and three children in school. The traders' association is divided: some say staying open will be seen as supporting the government; others say closing will ruin small businesses while large firms survive. Last month's strike cost you 180,000 CFA in lost sales. Police have warned that 'unauthorized gatherings' will be dispersed; a youth group has threatened to name shops that open. Your neighbor's shop was vandalized in April. You want to make a decision that is both principled and sustainable.
1. What should the shopkeeper do for the week? Set out two options and the criteria you would use, including non-economic ones.
Read the worked answer
Two realistic options are: (A) close fully and join the stay-at-home, or (B) open partially, with reduced hours and a back-door service for regular customers, preferably as part of a traders' association decision. A third option-open normally and ignore the call-is possible but carries the highest social and safety risk.
The criteria should include more than profit. Financial survival matters: 180,000 CFA was already lost last month, and a bank loan is due in six weeks. Physical safety matters: a neighbour's shop was vandalized, and the youth group has threatened to name shops that open. Solidarity and reputation matter because the shop depends on local customers. Legal risk matters because police have warned against unauthorized gatherings. Consistency with the owner's principles matters too: if the owner supports the national conference, closing has moral weight; if not, hiding behind the association is dishonest.
A defensible judgement is conditional: close for the first two days, then reassess with the traders' association. That limits losses, shows solidarity, and reduces the risk of being singled out. The shopkeeper should not pretend the decision is cost-free. The best answer acknowledges that sustainability and principle pull in different directions.
2. A historian later writes: 'The ghost towns were a turning point because they showed the regime had lost urban support.' What evidence from the setup would support or qualify this claim?
Read the worked answer
Supporting evidence includes the fact that opposition groups could call a week of closures and expect compliance, that a youth group could threaten to name shops that opened, and that the traders' association was divided rather than solidly pro-government. If many shops closed, that suggests broad urban discontent and organizational capacity.
Qualifying evidence is equally important. The shopkeeper's decision is shaped by fear of vandalism and by a bank loan, not only by political conviction. A closed shop may indicate coercion or financial vulnerability rather than support for the opposition. Large firms may survive a week; small businesses may not, so the protest can distort which voices are heard. Police warnings and the earlier vandalism show that public expression was not free. The claim also generalizes from Bamenda to 'the regime' and 'urban support' without turnout or participation data.
A careful historian would say the ghost towns showed visible opposition capacity and regime vulnerability, but not a simple loss of all urban support. The evidence supports a qualified claim, not a proven turning point.