CMT Level II study materials
CMT Level II study resources

Failed Range Breakout on an Earnings Gap

CMT Level II · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Failed Range Breakout on an Earnings Gap

XYZ Industrial has traded between 70 and 82.50 for eighteen months, with the 82.50 ceiling tested four times. On Tuesday it gaps up on an earnings surprise, trades to 84.60, and closes at 83.10, 0.7% above the line. Volume is 1.4 times the 50-day average, below the 2.0x you require for a valid breakout. The next four sessions retrace: closes of 82.40, 81.60, 80.90, and 80.30. ATR(14) is 2.10. The relative strength line versus the industrial sector made a lower high on the breakout day. Short interest is 4% of float. The 50-day MA is at 78.90 and rising. Options implied volatility fell after the gap. You hold a 3% position from 74.00; your mandate allows 5% maximum single-name exposure and requires a written invalidation level for every position.

1. Was this a valid range breakout? Assess volume, close location, gap context, and relative strength.

Read the worked answer

The breakout fails the quality test. A valid range breakout typically needs a close in the upper third of the day's range on volume at least 1.5-2.0x average, with the breakout level holding on the first pullback. Here volume was only 1.4x, implied volatility fell, and the relative strength line made a lower high-price strength was not confirmed by sector leadership. The gap is event-driven, and gaps that fill within a week often mark exhaustion rather than accumulation. Four consecutive lower closes and a close 2.4% below 82.50 put price back inside the eighteen-month range. Given ATR of 2.10, the 0.7% breakout close was well within one day's noise; the break never exceeded the range by a meaningful fraction of ATR. Treat it as a failed breakout until proven otherwise.

2. Where should invalidation sit, and how does that affect position sizing under the 5% cap?

Read the worked answer

Invalidation should sit where the bullish thesis is objectively wrong, not at an arbitrary percent. With entry at 74 and a range floor near 70, a protective stop below the rising 50-day MA at 78.90 gives back open profit but keeps the position alive for a re-break. If the breakout itself was the trade, the stop is a close below the recent low at 80.30 or one ATR below the breakout level (82.50 minus 2.10 equals 80.40); that level has already been breached, so the breakout trade is stopped out. For sizing, with a 5% cap and ATR of 2.10, risking 0.5% of portfolio at a 2-ATR stop of 4.20 implies a position of roughly 1.2 risk units. Do not add inside the range; wait for a fresh signal.

3. What would make you re-enter, and what does the failed breakout imply for the range's future?

Read the worked answer

Re-entry requires a fresh close above 82.50 on volume of at least 2x average that holds for three sessions, preferably with the relative strength line confirming. A failed breakout often increases the significance of the range: trapped longs above 82.50 become supply, so the next test needs more volume to absorb them. Watch the 70-72 floor; a decisive break there would project the range height of 12.50 lower to about 59.50. Do not automatically short a failed breakout while the 50-day MA is rising; instead reduce, then wait for either a lower-high rejection or a volume-backed reclaim. The key judgement is that the event gap changed information but not the range structure until price accepts outside it.