Cash Deposits Below Reporting Threshold at a Convenience Store
At a suburban branch, a manager reviews six weeks of cash activity for QuickMart LLC, a convenience store. Deposits total $186,000 across 23 visits, with 19 deposits between $8,700 and $9,600 and none at or above $10,000. The owner says the cash comes from store sales, but he declines to provide purchase invoices, payroll records, or a completed source-of-funds questionnaire. A teller reports that the owner asked whether the bank reports cash under ten thousand and later asked to split a $19,000 deposit into two days. The owner also purchases money orders of $2,000 to $3,000 weekly, often payable to individuals. The account has been open 14 months; expected monthly cash deposits were $25,000, and actual deposits average $124,000. The branch has no prior SAR filings on the customer. Local rules require CDD, EDD for higher-risk customers, and SAR filing for suspicious transactions; tipping off is prohibited.
1. Identify the red flags and explain whether this is reportable and why.
Read the worked answer
The pattern is not a single large cash transaction; it is a cluster of red flags. Nineteen deposits just below $10,000, the owner's question about reporting under ten thousand, the request to split a $19,000 deposit, and the refusal to provide ordinary business records all point to possible structuring or evasion of reporting requirements. The volume mismatch is equally important: expected monthly cash of $25,000 versus actual average of $124,000 is nearly five times the stated business profile, and the money orders to individuals add another unexplained channel. A convenience store can legitimately generate substantial cash, but the refusal to support that explanation with purchase invoices or payroll records prevents the bank from completing CDD and EDD. Reportability does not depend on a single transaction exceeding a threshold; it depends on suspicion. The combination of structuring behavior, inconsistent profile, and lack of source-of-funds evidence is enough to escalate and file a SAR within the institution's regulatory deadline. The branch should not conclude that the activity is legitimate simply because each deposit is below $10,000.
2. Outline immediate actions and documentation, including what to say to the customer.
Read the worked answer
Escalate immediately to the BSA/AML officer and preserve all records: deposit slips, teller notes, account-opening documents, expected-activity profile, money-order logs, and the owner's statements. Continue normal monitoring but do not alert the customer to the SAR. Complete EDD by requesting the missing invoices, payroll records, and source-of-funds questionnaire in a routine file-update tone. If the customer refuses, document the refusal and the reason given. File the SAR within the required period, including the structured deposit pattern, the threshold question, the split request, and the volume mismatch. Restrict account activity only with compliance approval; do not close the account in a way that signals a report. If the owner asks why the bank is asking questions, say the bank periodically updates customer information and must understand expected cash activity. Do not mention reporting thresholds, SARs, or law enforcement. Record who approved any continued activity and set a review date.
3. Recommend the relationship decision and the controls that should follow.
Read the worked answer
Treat the customer as high risk and consider exit after the SAR is filed, but only with senior compliance and legal approval. An exit must not tip off the customer; use a neutral, documented reason such as the bank's inability to complete CDD or the account being outside the branch's risk appetite. Before exit, ensure the SAR is filed and all records are retained. If the bank keeps the relationship, impose enhanced monitoring, lower cash-deposit limits, require monthly source-of-funds support, and review the account at least quarterly. At branch level, add controls: teller escalation when a business makes repeated near-threshold cash deposits, a report that aggregates cash by customer across branches, mandatory EDD triggers for volume above profile, and training on structuring red flags. Document the decision and the rationale so the file shows a reasoned judgement, not an automatic closure. The key control failure here is not the absence of a prior SAR; it is the failure to connect the owner's threshold questions and split request to the deposit pattern quickly.