Intermediate Banking Professional study materials
Intermediate Banking Professional study resources

Intermediate Banking Professional: Risk Management

Intermediate Banking Professional · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Risk Management

Risk Management tests whether a candidate can name the risk, measure it in the right units, and govern it: the risk taxonomy, appetite and limits, the three lines of defence, market and liquidity risk metrics, operational risk under the revised Basel framework, stress testing and ICAAP.

Taxonomy and governance

  • Credit, market (traded), interest-rate risk in the banking book, liquidity and funding, operational, country and transfer, reputational and strategic risk.
  • First line owns risk, second line sets framework and challenges, third line (internal audit) provides independent assurance.
  • Risk appetite is expressed in limits: exposure caps, VaR limits, stop-loss, liquidity ratios, concentration limits, and key risk indicators with escalation triggers.

Measurement

  • Market risk: modified duration gives ΔP ≈ −D x P x Δy; PV01 gives the value of one basis point; VaR is a loss threshold at a confidence level and horizon, not a worst case, and is not sub-additive; expected shortfall averages losses beyond the VaR point.
  • Operational risk under the Basel III final reforms uses the standardised approach: a Business Indicator Component multiplied by an Internal Loss Multiplier.
  • Liquidity: LCR and NSFR, gap analysis, survival horizon and stress outflows; ICAAP aggregates all risks against available capital.

Worked example

A bond portfolio of 200m has a modified duration of 4.5. Yields rise 60 basis points. ΔP ≈ −4.5 x 200m x 0.006 = −5.4m, a 2.7% mark-to-market loss. Reasoning: duration is linear and local, so it overstates losses for small moves in the other direction and understates them for large moves because convexity offsets; a 300bp shock needs a full revaluation or stress scenario rather than the duration formula.

Traps that cost marks

  • Describing VaR as the maximum possible loss.
  • Mixing the VaR confidence level or horizon (99%/one-day versus 99%/ten-day).
  • Using historical correlations in a stress test, when correlations converge in a crisis.
  • Treating banking-book interest-rate risk as market risk and applying trading limits.
  • Presenting backtesting exceptions without analysing the model or the data window.