Attendance versus equitable benefit
A community prevention programme offers an evening education session at a central clinic. Attendance is high among people who live nearby but low among shift workers and residents who need accessible transport. Knowledge scores improve among those who complete both surveys. The team has not yet measured sustained behavior, clinical outcomes or the experiences of people who did not attend. A report draft describes the programme as having eliminated the community’s preventable disease burden. Participants also report that some recommended foods are difficult to afford locally. The evaluator must distinguish the measured achievements from unsupported conclusions and propose a practical next assessment that addresses barriers rather than blaming those who were absent.
1. What can the current results support?
Read the worked answer
They support a statement about attendance and measured knowledge change among the surveyed participants, with selection and follow-up limitations. They do not establish disease-burden reduction.
2. How should the programme improve its evaluation?
Read the worked answer
Investigate access, work and affordability barriers, adapt delivery where justified and measure relevant subsequent outcomes across groups, including people who could not participate initially.