MDR-TB, Confidentiality, and a Pregnant Wife
Bikash, 38, is diagnosed with sputum-positive multidrug-resistant TB at a DOTS centre in Morang. He works on the finishing floor of a crowded carpet factory and lives with his wife and two children in two rented rooms. He refuses admission and refuses to tell his wife or employer. He says, 'If you tell anyone, I will stop the medicines and leave.' He has received two weeks of treatment and has missed two of the last six doses. The treatment supporter is his cousin, who has been sworn to secrecy. The nurse knows that the National TB Programme requires notification and contact investigation, and that the factory has 60 workers in one hall. His wife is 20 weeks pregnant.
1. Identify the ethical and legal tensions in this situation.
Read the worked answer
The central tension is between Bikash's autonomy and confidentiality and the nurse's duty to protect identifiable others. Confidentiality is a strong professional obligation, but it is not absolute when a serious communicable disease poses a risk to contacts who cannot protect themselves. His wife is a household contact and is pregnant; untreated TB poses risks to her and the pregnancy. The factory workers are also contacts in a crowded environment, although the degree of risk depends on ventilation, duration, and infectiousness.
The nurse also has duties of nonmaleficence and beneficence: MDR-TB requires sustained treatment, and missed doses increase the risk of treatment failure and further resistance. Disclosure that destroys trust could push Bikash away from care, which would harm both him and the public. The ethical response is therefore not 'confidentiality versus public health' in the abstract, but the least intrusive disclosure necessary to protect contacts while keeping him in treatment. Legal notification duties support this approach but do not require broadcasting his diagnosis to everyone.
2. What is your action plan over the next 48 hours?
Read the worked answer
First, explain to Bikash what the law and national TB programme require, in plain language, before any disclosure. Distinguish notification of the programme from disclosure to his wife or employer. Offer him a supported disclosure: ask him to bring his wife to the centre, or let the nurse and counsellor meet them together. Explain that his wife needs screening and that early treatment protects her and the pregnancy.
Second, notify the TB programme as required and arrange contact investigation through the proper channel. Screen household contacts, including the wife, and arrange occupational health follow-up for the factory without unnecessarily naming him to all workers. Third, address adherence: find out why doses were missed, offer treatment support, food or transport help, and a realistic ambulatory plan. Involve the counsellor and, if needed, a social worker. Fourth, document the discussion, the disclosure plan, and the referrals.
The aim is to keep Bikash in care while protecting contacts. Coercion alone is likely to fail; support plus clear limits is more defensible.
3. He threatens to stop treatment and leave if you disclose. How do you respond, and what limits apply?
Read the worked answer
Acknowledge his fear and his right to be involved in decisions, but do not promise unconditional secrecy. Say clearly that you cannot keep his diagnosis from the TB programme and that his wife, as a household contact, needs to be offered screening. Offer to tell her with him present, or to have a counsellor explain it, and explain what will happen if he refuses. If he still refuses, disclose only to those who need to know for contact tracing and treatment, not to his employer or the wider community.
The limits are necessity and proportionality: disclose the minimum information to the minimum number of people for a defined public health purpose. Do not abandon him or refuse care because he is difficult. Continue treatment support and document his refusal, your explanation, and the disclosures made. If there is serious doubt about the legal duty or the risk, seek advice from the district TB officer or the health facility's ethics committee. The nurse should not be the sole decision-maker in a conflict of this gravity, but she must not collude in hiding a treatable, transmissible disease from a pregnant household contact.