A market pilot with a useful but unprofitable result
A hypothetical student enterprise plans to deliver study boxes to local customers. Its founders believe customers value convenience, but this is initially an assumption rather than established demand. They offer a limited pilot of two hundred boxes, each priced at ten currency units. Direct purchasing, packing and delivery cost six per box. A targeted campaign costs one thousand for the period. All boxes are sold and paid for, and there are no other supplied costs, credit transactions or remaining stock in this simplified exercise. A survey of those buyers reports strong satisfaction, but no repeat purchases have yet been observed. One founder calls the pilot profitable because revenue exceeds fulfillment cost; another wants to invest in a large automated packing system immediately. The team must decide which conclusions the evidence supports and which assumptions still require testing.
1. Calculate revenue, contribution and the result after campaign cost.
Read the worked answer
Revenue is 200 ×10 =2,000. Direct cost is 200 ×6 =1,200, leaving contribution 800. After campaign cost 1,000 the result is a loss 200 before any omitted costs. Contribution is not profit after all period costs.
2. Identify a useful next test and a conclusion that would be premature.
Read the worked answer
Test actual repeat ordering or willingness to pay a price that covers the complete cost model, with a threshold agreed before the test. Satisfaction among initial buyers does not prove repeat demand or justify a large irreversible packing investment.