Coinsurance, Actual Cash Value, and the Bakery Pipe Break
A burst pipe closed a Boulder bakery for 20 days. The commercial property policy has a building limit of $720,000, an 80% coinsurance clause, a $10,000 deductible, and replacement cost coverage. At the time of loss the building's replacement cost was $1,000,000 and its actual cash value was $840,000. The repair estimate is $300,000 replacement cost; completed repairs will cost $280,000 actual cash value. The policy also covers business income with a 72-hour waiting period; the bakery's daily net income is $2,000 and continuing expenses are $600 per day. The insured also wants to claim $40,000 to install sprinklers required by the city's newly adopted code; the policy has no ordinance-or-law coverage. The insurer initially offered $250,000 for the building and 17 days of business income. The public adjuster must evaluate the offer.
1. Calculate the building payment under the coinsurance clause and explain the formula.
Read the worked answer
Required insurance = 80% × $1,000,000 = $800,000. The policy carried $720,000, so the coinsurance ratio is 720,000 ÷ 800,000 = 0.90. For a replacement-cost loss, the formula is (limit carried ÷ required limit) × loss − deductible. Using the $300,000 repair estimate: 0.90 × $300,000 = $270,000; minus $10,000 = $260,000. If the insurer pays actual cash value first, the initial payment is 0.90 × $280,000 = $252,000; minus $10,000 = $242,000, with $18,000 of recoverable depreciation withheld until repairs are completed. The insurer's $250,000 offer must be identified as RCV or ACV; if it is the final RCV payment, it is $10,000 short of $260,000. If it is an initial ACV payment, compare it to $242,000, not $260,000.
2. Calculate the business income payment and explain the waiting period.
Read the worked answer
The 72-hour waiting period equals three days. The bakery was closed 20 days, so the compensable business-income period is 17 days. Business income loss is net income plus continuing operating expenses: $2,000 + $600 = $2,600 per day. 17 × $2,600 = $44,200. If the insurer offered 17 days at only $2,000 per day, or $34,000, it omitted continuing expenses and underpaid by $10,200. The public adjuster should document the closure, daily sales and profit records, continuing expenses such as rent, utilities, and key staff, and mitigation efforts. The waiting period does not eliminate coverage for the remaining 17 days.
3. How should the public adjuster handle the $40,000 code upgrade and the insurer's initial offer?
Read the worked answer
The $40,000 sprinkler upgrade is not covered unless the policy has ordinance-or-law or increased-cost-of-construction coverage. The policy has none, so the public adjuster should not include it as a covered building loss; doing so would inflate the claim and could be an unfair claim practice. The adjuster should explain the gap to the insured, document the code citation, and ask the insurer whether any limited coverage applies. On the offer, the adjuster should demand that the insurer identify the ACV/RCV basis, apply coinsurance correctly, and pay the omitted continuing expenses. The adjuster should negotiate the $10,000 building difference and $10,200 business-income difference, and correct the $40,000 request rather than use it as leverage.