A completed deployment has not delivered its intended benefit
A fictional enterprise completes a technology deployment within the approved schedule and purchase budget. The business case expected a reduction in customer waiting time, but supplied service measurements show no improvement and the benefit owner has not reviewed the process changes needed outside IT. A colleague proposes closing the governance action because the system went live. Another separates project completion, management operation, benefit ownership and stakeholder outcomes. This written case approves no investment and changes no service. It asks which success claim is supported, what outcome remains unproven and how an enterprise governance review should follow the actual business case rather than substitute a technical delivery milestone for realized value.
1. What does the project result establish?
Read the worked answer
It supports the recorded deployment milestone and its stated schedule/budget result. It does not prove that the customer waiting-time benefit was realized.
2. What should governance and management clarify?
Read the worked answer
Review actual benefit ownership, process dependencies, service measures, assumptions and justified next actions under the business case. Governance monitors intended outcomes while management performs the authorized work.