CCOAK study materials
CCOAK study resources

Positive Biological Indicator in a Two-Autoclave Office

CCOAK · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Positive Biological Indicator in a Two-Autoclave Office

Monday morning. The office uses two steam autoclaves. The biological indicator from Friday's run in autoclave B is positive; the last negative was Wednesday. Between Wednesday and Friday, autoclave B processed 14 pouches, including banding setups and a molar band cementation tray, and those instruments were used on patients on Thursday and Friday. Also on Friday, a new assistant 'sterilized' a carbide bur and a composite-placement instrument in a glutaraldehyde tray for 10 minutes because she said the bur was not heat-stable 'in her previous office.' A pouch in Friday's load had a broken seal and was placed back in the drawer. The office manager wants to know whether to call patients.

1. List the immediate actions you would take with autoclave B and the 14 pouches, and justify each in terms of what a positive BI actually tells you.

Read the worked answer

A positive BI means the load did not reach sterilization conditions - treat every item in the affected loads as non-sterile.

  1. Stop using autoclave B immediately and label it 'do not use.'
  2. Quarantine the 14 pouches. Anything from those loads still in the office should be reprocessed (cleaned, repackaged, re-sterilized and re-tested) or discarded if it cannot be reprocessed.
  3. Recall and notify. Identify patients treated with those instruments Thursday and Friday; the orthodontist and infection control lead decide notification based on the items involved and local policy. Document.
  4. Investigate the cause: overloading, pouches too full, improper tape, inadequate drying, water quality, door gasket, cycle parameters, and operator error are all more likely than a sudden mechanical failure.
  5. Retest: run a biological indicator with a control; do not return the unit to service until three consecutive negative BIs (or the manufacturer's requirement) are documented.
  6. Review the log for the last known negative BI and any loads in between.

Reasoning: a single positive can be a false positive, but you cannot assume that. The conservative response protects patients and gives you data.

2. Evaluate the glutaraldehyde tray and the broken-seal pouch. What would you do and what would you tell the new assistant?

Read the worked answer

The glutaraldehyde tray: glutaraldehyde is a high-level disinfectant; 10 minutes may meet the label for some semi-critical items, but it is not a substitute for autoclaving a heat-stable carbide bur. The bur should be cleaned (ultrasonic or manual), dried, pouched and steam-sterilized. If an instrument is heat-sensitive, follow the manufacturer's contact time and concentration monitoring, and use it only for semi-critical items.

The broken-seal pouch: a broken seal means the barrier is compromised; the item is not sterile. It should be removed from the drawer, reprocessed and re-pouched. Do not use it anyway because it looks clean.

What to tell the new assistant: no blame, but clear correction - heat-stable items go in the autoclave; the glutaraldehyde tray is for items that cannot tolerate heat, with the correct contact time and monitoring; packaging integrity is checked before every load is stored. Retrain and document competency. Also review PPE and ventilation, because glutaraldehyde exposure is a real occupational hazard.

3. What documentation and communication should follow?

Read the worked answer

Documentation and follow-up:

  • Record the BI result, date, autoclave ID, load contents, corrective actions, retest dates, and the person responsible.
  • Keep the positive BI and control results.
  • File an incident note; if patients were exposed to non-sterile instruments, document who was notified, when, and what they were told.
  • Update the infection control log and the exposure control plan.
  • Schedule staff training on loading, packaging, and sterilization monitoring; verify the new assistant's competency.

Reasoning: the exam tests whether you can connect a monitoring failure to a patient-safety process. The key judgement is that a positive BI is a system failure, not just a machine problem: the response must cover the instrument, the load, the patients, and the staff.