The prisoner who asked you not to tell anyone
You are on the 14:00–22:00 shift in a 48-bed remand unit with one other officer. She is on her meal break at 20:40 when a 19-year-old first-time remand prisoner approaches you. He is crying and shaking. In broken English he tells you that two prisoners in his unit take his canteen each week and that one said tonight he would 'get him'. He says if he is called a dog he would rather 'not be here'. He has not slept for three nights and has thought about ending it. He asks you not to tell anyone. He declines the telephone interpreter, saying everyone will know. He has a thin cut on his forearm.
1. What do you say and do in the first five minutes? Which promises do you make, and which do you avoid?
Read the worked answer
Slow the situation down. Lower your voice, move him somewhere you can see and be seen but others cannot hear, and do not stand over him. Call the other officer back from her break - you should not be managing this alone.
Ask directly about suicide: thoughts, plan, means, previous attempts, what has kept him going. Direct questions do not plant the idea; they give you the information you need to keep him alive tonight.
Then be honest about the limits, before you act: 'I can't sit on this on my own. I have to tell my supervisor and get the nurse to see you tonight, because I can't keep you safe by myself. I'll keep it to the people who need to know.'
Promises you can keep: 'I won't tell other prisoners.' 'I'll tell you what happens next.' 'I'll come back and check on you.'
Promises you must not make: 'This stays between us.' 'Nothing will happen to them.' 'You won't be moved.' A false promise buys five minutes of calm and destroys every future disclosure - his and anyone else who hears about it.
Do not leave him alone if risk is immediate; get him to health and set an interim observation arrangement with your supervisor.
2. He refuses an interpreter and asks you to keep it confidential. How do you handle both, and what do you record?
Read the worked answer
His refusal is rational, not obstructive. In his world a label follows a man around the unit. But a risk assessment and any health consent conducted in broken English is unreliable, and miscommunication here is the kind that ends in a death.
Re-offer properly, don't just repeat the offer: a phone interpreter in a private room, an explanation that interpreters are bound by confidentiality and are not prisoners or staff from his unit, the option of a male interpreter, and a later second offer. Record that it was offered and declined, and why.
Never use another prisoner as an interpreter - not even a helpful one, not even for five minutes. It breaches confidentiality and puts him at risk.
Confidentiality has a defined edge. Explain what will be shared, with whom and why: supervisor for safety, health for assessment, intelligence for the extortion allegation. The extortion is a separate safety matter and goes up regardless of his wishes; his fear of being a dog is precisely what the intimidation is designed to produce.
Record: his words quoted, your questions and his answers about suicidal thinking, observation of the arm injury, demeanour, the interpreter offered and declined, notifications made, referrals, observation level and review time - in the incident report, not the unit's general chatter.
3. You hand over at 22:00. What goes into the handover and record, and what deliberately does not?
Read the worked answer
In the record and handover (need-to-know):
- The disclosure of threats, recorded as allegation: 'Prisoner alleged that two prisoners, whom he named, have taken his canteen.' Not as established fact.
- Suicidal ideation, what he said, the assessment questions asked, and the current observation level and who set it.
- The forearm injury and the nurse review time and outcome.
- Interpreter offered and declined; interpreter to be re-offered.
- Outstanding actions: who checks him, when, at-risk review, whether the two named prisoners are billeted near him.
Deliberately not included:
- Your theory about whether the other two are guilty, or gossip about any prisoner.
- Detail of his mental state beyond what the next officer needs to keep him safe.
- Anything said in front of other prisoners, or written where prisoners might see it.
Why it matters: handover is a clinical and security tool, not a conversation. Over-sharing breaches privacy and can inflame the exact situation he is frightened of; under-sharing kills people. The test for each line is: does the next officer need this to keep someone safe tonight?
Follow up yourself - check that the nurse review actually happened before you leave.