Revenue Recognition and Audit Evidence
You are the audit senior on the financial statement audit of TechSolutions Inc., a private company that develops customized software for clients. The company recognizes revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based on costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs. During the current year, TechSolutions entered into a large contract with a new customer, MegaCorp, to develop a complex system for $10 million. As of year-end, TechSolutions has incurred $3 million in costs and estimates total costs to complete will be $7 million, resulting in 30% completion ($3M/$10M). However, you discover that the project manager, who provided the cost estimates, left the company abruptly two weeks before year-end. The new project manager has not yet reviewed the estimates. Additionally, the contract includes a penalty clause of $1 million if the project is not completed by a specified date, which is 6 months after year-end. The project is currently on schedule, but there is a risk of delay due to a key component that is on backorder. The client's CFO is pressuring you to complete the audit quickly because the company is negotiating a loan with a bank.
1. What are the key audit risks related to revenue recognition for the MegaCorp contract, and what substantive procedures would you perform to address them?
Read the worked answer
Key audit risks:
- Estimation uncertainty: The percentage-of-completion method relies on estimates of total costs to complete. The departure of the project manager who provided the estimates creates a risk that the estimates are unreliable or biased. The new manager's lack of review increases this risk.
- Penalty clause: The $1 million penalty if the project is not completed on time could indicate that the contract contains a significant financing component or that revenue should be constrained. The backorder risk increases the likelihood of delay, which may affect the transaction price.
- Pressure from management: The CFO's pressure to complete the audit quickly due to loan negotiations may indicate increased risk of fraud or error in revenue recognition.
Substantive procedures:
- Obtain the contract and review terms, including the penalty clause, to assess whether it represents a variable consideration that should be estimated and constrained.
- Interview the new project manager and other technical staff to assess the reasonableness of the cost estimates. Consider engaging an independent specialist to review the estimates.
- Examine costs incurred to date by agreeing to invoices, timesheets, and other supporting documents. Test the accumulation of costs.
- Review project status reports, budgets, and correspondence with the customer to assess progress and likelihood of delay. Evaluate the impact of the backordered component on the completion date and penalty.
- Perform a retrospective review of prior estimates to assess management's ability to estimate accurately.
- Consider whether the penalty should be accounted for as a reduction of revenue (variable consideration) or as a provision, and evaluate management's accounting.
- Assess the adequacy of disclosures regarding estimation uncertainty and the penalty clause.
- Maintain professional skepticism and do not let the CFO's pressure affect the nature, timing, and extent of procedures.
2. How should you respond to the CFO's request to complete the audit quickly? What professional standards apply?
Read the worked answer
The CFO's request creates a threat to objectivity and independence, specifically a pressure threat. As an auditor, you must comply with professional standards, including:
- Due professional care: Perform the audit with professional skepticism and obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regardless of time pressure.
- Integrity and objectivity: Do not allow pressure from management to compromise the quality of the audit. The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requires auditors to be free from conflicts of interest and to avoid subordinating judgment to others.
- Audit documentation: Document the procedures performed and conclusions reached, including any discussions about time pressure.
Response:
- Politely explain to the CFO that the audit must be performed in accordance with auditing standards, and that sufficient appropriate evidence is required before issuing an opinion.
- Discuss the matter with the engagement partner and consider whether the pressure indicates a risk of material misstatement due to fraud (e.g., management may be trying to hide something).
- If the pressure continues, consider withdrawing from the engagement if the client imposes a limitation on the scope of the audit. However, before withdrawal, communicate with those charged with governance.
- Document the request and your response.