CPA Australia Taxation study materials
CPA Australia Taxation study resources

Commercial building sale: going concern, GST and margin scheme

CPA Australia Taxation · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Commercial building sale: going concern, GST and margin scheme

Orion Pty Ltd is registered for GST and accounts on an accrual basis. It is selling a commercial office building to Nexus Pty Ltd for $5.5 million, with settlement on 30 June 2025. The contract, signed 15 May 2025, states that the supply is GST-free as a going concern because the building is leased to three tenants and Orion will transfer the leases. Nexus has applied for GST registration but at settlement it has not received an ABN and is not registered. Nexus expects registration within four weeks. Orion acquired the building in 2012 for $4 million from a vendor who used the margin scheme, so Orion did not pay GST on acquisition. Orion also agreed to sell the office furniture for $55,000 separately. Orion's accountant is considering treating the building sale as taxable and using the margin scheme.

1. Is Orion's supply of the building GST-free as a going concern? Explain the requirements and the consequence if it is not.

Read the worked answer

A going concern supply is GST-free only if the supplier and recipient are registered for GST, the supply is of a going concern, and the agreement is in writing. Orion is registered. Nexus is not registered at settlement; a pending application is not enough. The contract wording does not make the supply GST-free. Therefore the supply is taxable. Orion must include GST of 1/11 of $5.5 million, which is $500,000, in its BAS for the tax period containing settlement. Nexus cannot claim an input tax credit unless it is registered and acquires the building for a creditable purpose. If Nexus registers later, that does not retrospectively convert the supply into a GST-free going concern. The practical solutions are to delay settlement until Nexus is registered, or to settle as a taxable supply and price in the GST. The furniture sale is a separate taxable supply; GST is 1/11 of $55,000, or $5,000, unless the furniture is part of the going concern and the going concern conditions are met, which they are not here.

2. Assume Orion wants to use the margin scheme on the building. Calculate the GST and compare it with the full GST outcome. What agreements and eligibility issues matter?

Read the worked answer

The margin scheme can reduce GST on the building. Orion acquired the building in 2012 for $4 million from a vendor who used the margin scheme, so Orion did not pay GST on acquisition. If Orion and Nexus agree in writing to apply the margin scheme, the margin is $5.5 million less $4 million, or $1.5 million. GST is 1/11 of $1.5 million, which is $136,364, not $500,000. That saves $363,636. But the margin scheme and going concern are alternative treatments: Orion cannot treat the supply as GST-free going concern and also use the margin scheme. Eligibility matters: the margin scheme must be agreed in writing before settlement, the property must be eligible, and Orion must have records of the acquisition. If Orion had claimed input tax credits on the acquisition, the margin calculation would need adjustment. The furniture is not part of the margin scheme unless it is included in the property supply and eligible. Orion should compare the commercial outcome: under the margin scheme Nexus may have a reduced input tax credit, but it is not registered yet, so the immediate cash cost falls on Orion.

3. What should Orion do if Nexus registers for GST two days before settlement but the contract has not been amended?

Read the worked answer

If Nexus is registered at the time of settlement, the going concern condition can be met, but the contract must still support the GST-free treatment. The contract already states going concern; if it also records the parties' agreement and the recipient's registration details, the supply can be GST-free. Orion should obtain Nexus's ABN and GST registration evidence before settlement, confirm the leases and business assets are transferred, and ensure the agreement is in writing. If the contract is silent or inconsistent, a variation before settlement is safer. Registration two days before settlement is sufficient if it is effective at the date of supply. If there is any doubt, Orion could settle as taxable under the margin scheme, which may be cheaper than full GST, but it must have the written margin scheme agreement. The worst outcome is to treat the supply as GST-free without evidence, because Orion remains liable for the GST if the conditions are not met.