Crestview Insurance: Allocating Adjusting Capacity After a Hurricane
Crestview Insurance writes homeowners and small commercial property along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts. A Category 3 hurricane made landfall eleven days ago. Crestview has received 14,200 claims, roughly 60 percent of an average year's volume, and estimates 3,900 more are still unreported. It employs 38 staff property adjusters and has deployed 120 independent catastrophe adjusters under a standing contract, but field reports show 30 percent of assignments are being re-inspected because of scope disagreements. Average time from first notice of loss to first contact is 6.4 days against a 2-day internal standard and a 5-day requirement in one state. Complaints have tripled. Case reserves must still be set on total losses and on reopened claims. The reinsurance treaty carries a $25 million retention per occurrence and requires notice within 48 hours on any claim above $500,000. The claims vice president must decide how to allocate the remaining adjusting capacity.
1. How should Crestview allocate its remaining adjusting capacity? Justify your triage criteria rather than defaulting to first-in, first-out.
Read the worked answer
First-in, first-out optimizes fairness to the queue and nothing else. Capacity should follow expected severity, uncertainty, and regulatory exposure.
Tier 1 - immediate field assignment. Total losses, commercial property with business interruption exposure, and every claim with an estimated severity above $500,000. The large-loss tier matters twice: severity drives cost, and each $500,000+ claim starts a 48-hour reinsurance notice clock. A total loss that sits also accrues additional living expense daily, so delay cost is steeply non-linear. Tier 2 - next tranche. Claims in the state with the 5-day contact requirement already at day 3 or beyond; habitational losses; claims showing fraud or public adjuster indicators, where delay converts a manageable claim into litigation; and vulnerable policyholders (elderly, no alternative housing), which drive both complaint volume and department scrutiny. Tier 3 - desk and virtual handling. Contents-only and small structural claims handled by photo/video estimating and virtual inspection. These consume the least field capacity per dollar of exposure and free field adjusters for Tier 1. Tier 4 - deferred inspection. Routine small claims where emergency mitigation is already complete.
Why this ordering. Compare a $300,000 total loss against a $9,000 fence claim. The total loss accrues living expenses, is likely to be disputed, and carries treaty reporting obligations; one day of delay on it costs more than a week on the fence. Reallocate the re-inspection workload too: 30 percent re-inspection is consuming capacity that should be inspecting new losses, so move re-inspection to sampling once the scope standard is enforced.
2. Re-inspection of 30 percent of catastrophe assignments signals a quality problem. Diagnose the likely causes and prescribe a corrective plan that does not simply add more reviewers.
Read the worked answer
A 30 percent re-inspection rate is a symptom, and adding reviewers treats the symptom at the cost of adjusting capacity. Diagnose first by asking what the re-inspections actually found: dollar deltas, missed scope items, coverage misapplication, or pricing differences. The pattern tells you which cause dominates.
Likely causes.
- Onboarding: 120 independent adjusters deployed quickly, trained on Crestview's authority limits and coverage forms inconsistently or not at all.
- No shared scope standard: storm-damage scope varies by adjuster judgment, so a staff adjuster re-inspects anything that 'looks different' rather than anything actually wrong.
- Estimating platform and price list mismatch between carriers and vendors, producing line-item variance that is not an error.
- Vendor incentives paying for volume and closed files rather than accuracy.
Corrective plan.
- Publish a written scope and estimating guideline for the event: what is covered, what documentation is required, and the authority limit at which referral is mandatory.
- Certify before deployment and require 100 percent review of each new adjuster's first ten files, then move to statistical sampling by adjuster and by peril.
- Standardize on one estimating platform and price list for the event.
- Hold a daily 15-minute calibration huddle on three anonymized files, so disputes are resolved against a standard rather than between individuals.
- Rebuild the vendor scorecard: weight re-inspection findings, cycle time, and complaint generation, and tie fee-at-risk to accuracy rather than volume.
- Track the re-inspection delta in dollars, not just counts - a large number of small variances is a training issue; a small number of large variances is a severity problem needing escalation.
3. What should Crestview do about reserving and reinsurance reporting while catastrophe volume is overwhelming the claims operation?
Read the worked answer
Catastrophe surges are exactly when reserving discipline degrades, because file handling is deferred and the easiest reserve to set is none at all. The resulting deficiency surfaces a year later as adverse development.
Reinsurance notice. Build a large-loss register on day one. Sweep new first notices and field reports daily for any claim with an indicated severity above $500,000, assign an adjuster immediately even if inspection is deferred, and log the notice date and time against the 48-hour treaty requirement. Missing a notice window can prejudice recovery, and late notice is discovered in the reinsurance audit, not the claims unit. Case reserves. Set an initial case reserve within a defined interval of first notice using a documented method - for example, a storm-specific severity schedule by construction type and damage category, adjusted by field report - and require a named adjuster to own each reserve on the large-loss register. Do not allow catastrophe triage to postpone reserve setting on non-catastrophe claims filed in the same period; that is the classic source of quiet deterioration. Aggregate view. Track reported claims and modeled ultimate side by side. Crestview has 14,200 reported against 3,900 expected unreported, so reported counts are not a proxy for ultimate. Reserve on an expected-claim basis using the model, then true up as reporting matures. Documentation and governance. A catastrophe reserve committee should review the register, the IBNR estimate, and the reinsurance recoverable weekly, and the file should be examinable by the reinsurer. Treat the reinsurance reporting timeline as a compliance obligation with an owner, not a finance afterthought.